You probably haven’t, at least if you’ve been watching FoxNews.
Hamza Kashgari, as Nina Shea and yours truly have noted in recent days, is a Saudi journalist and blogger who took the occasion of Mohammed’s birthday to tweet some uncomplimentary things about Islam’s founding prophet. The Daily Beast recounts the three offending tweets:
“On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you’ve always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you,” he wrote in one tweet.
“On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more,” he wrote in a second.
“On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more,” he concluded in a third.
Doesn’t sound too terrible, especially if you compare it to the sort of things the Obama Left has been saying about faithful Christians. Yet, it is a profound sin under classical sharia law, which happens to be the law of Saudi Arabia. The 23-year-old’s tweets instantly touched off a firestorm. Kashgari desperately tried to delete the posts within six hours, but it was too late: the damage was done as Saudi clerics and thousands of Saudi citizens started baying for his blood.
Kashgari attempted to flee to New Zealand. But Saudi authorities issued a warrant for his arrest on blasphemy charges. In fact, the Daily Beast reports that the kingdom’s leading news site says the warrant was issued by King Abdullah himself. Reportedly with the assistance of Interpol, Kashgari was apprehended in Malaysia and swiftly extradited to Saudi Arabia. In an interview with the Daily Beast prior to his arrest, Kashgari explained, “I view my actions as part of a process toward freedom. I was demanding my right to practice the most basic human rights — freedom of expression and thought.” These rights may be unalienable in Western thought, but they are unrecognized in sharia. Kashgari could well be executed.
As I’ve related before, Reliance of the Traveller — A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, is an authoritative translation of sharia that has been endorsed by, among others, the Islamic Research Academy of al-Azhar University in Cairo (the ancient seat of Sunni jurisprudential scholarship) and the International Institute of Islamic Thought, an influential Muslim Brotherhood think-tank. The manual instructs that, under sharia, the penalty for apostasy from Islam is death. (See, e.g., Sec. o8.1, “When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.) The apostasy section goes on to describe “Acts that Entail Leaving Islam” (Sec. o8.7), and these include, “to speak words that imply unbelief”; “to revile Allah or His messenger [viz., Mohammed]“; to mock or deny faith; or to deny “scholarly consensus.” In Islam, the consensus is that Mohammed is the perfect example whose life is to be emulated, not questioned or disparaged.
Mr. Kashgari’s tweets have thus placed him in grave peril under the Saudi sharia system. Given the palpable jeopardy this poses for free speech globally — particularly in light of Interpol’s reported involvement in issuing a “red notice” based on the Saudi blasphemy charge, and the Obama administration’s strange 2009 move to expand Interpol’s legal immunity (see here, here and here) — one would think his plight would be a big deal. But my friend Diana West has discovered that it is not a big deal on FoxNews. A word search for “Kashgari” on the Fox website turns up no hits.
As I mentioned a few weeks back, the number two shareholder at Fox (after NewsCorp) is Alwaleed bin Talal, a member of the Saudi royal family whose bottomless pockets back various American projects designed to cast sharia law in a favorable light — such as Islamic studies programs at Georgetown and Harvard. In 2006, Accuracy in Media reported that Prince bin Talal had pressured Fox into downplaying the Muslim role in rioting in France. And it just so happens that, late last year, bin Talal plunked down $300 million for a stake in Twitter, the social media service that published the tweets that have Mr. Kashgari in such dire straits.
Probably just a coincidence.
I wonder Mr. McCarthy if you made those same linkages to the horrors of the Saudi regime and the previous Administration...especially when George W. Bush was shown holding hands with the Saudi prince?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn fairness to Fox News, Greg Guttfeld had this as the lede on one of the Red Eye shows late last week.
Given who owns 5% of Newscorp, I was surprised it was discussed at all.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseGuttfeld is a bit of a maverick on Fox News, though, and a very funny man.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy is our culture so suicidal? Why do we tolerate Interpol assisting in the arrest of someone for a "religious" crime? I thought this was the 21st century, not the 6th or 16th. Will we soon see a day when the FBI would assist in this kind of arrest "warrant" if it occurred on US soil?
I'm sorry, Mr. Franklin--but we couldn't keep our republic. We cut its throat with our blindness and self-centered introspection while the barbarians crossed over the frozen Rhine River and burnt our cities and our children.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm waiting for Mike Potemra to weigh in on this. I'm confident there is a positive and poignently inspiring aspect to this event somewhere.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMoney talks all around the world and sometimes, like now, it prevents talking by others. While Fox News is generally more fair and balanced than other networks, there are certain news stories they steer clear of, which is something Fox News conservatives criticize when liberal media do it. When the media doesn't do its job, dangerous things happen that most people know nothing about. How many people know who Alwaleed bin Talal is or are aware of his connection to Fox News and his efforts to enhance the image of Sharia Law? While Fox News isn't directly participating in the enhancement efforts, it isn't doing anything to inform its viewers about them. While Bill O'Reilly and others on FNC are critical of moderate Muslims who have connections to or are tolerant of radical Muslim organizations, they apparently don't consider Sharia Law radical, which is a departure from what most Americans think. Killing people as a form of punishment for violating religious or cultural laws is not acceptable and that is a standard of Sharia Law. Shame on Fox News!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNot just Fox (although I understand your special attention to them) but all our media has been silent. Yet only with intense publicity does Mr. Kashgari have any chance. The sad aspect of this is that the tweets seem to show real love and affection for Mohammed who I understood always insisted on his humanity and wanted no special deference. (Is that not why his burial place is unknown?)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseRe; "In fact, the Daily Beast reports that the kingdom’s leading news site says the warrant was issued by King Abdullah himself."
Is that the same King Adullah as this fat, retrograde autocrat?:
External Link
Some friends huh?
BTW, the U.S. dances to the tune called by its Merchants of Death. Let nothing stand in the way of a deal:
External Link
$60 BILLION buys Saudi Arabia a lot of torture, repression and beat downs. No questions asked.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf Kashgari had landed in New York, would he have suffered the same fate? How about London? New Delhi?
In my view, this tells us a great deal about what's going on in Malaysia. Kashgari apparently thought that he'd be safe in the "liberal" and "democratic" Islamic state of Malaysia. Think again. Ethnic Chinese and Indian Malaysians have told me that life is increasingly difficult for them there, and that they have considered emigrating.
Lastly, if Saudi Arabia were to issue a warrant for McCarthy or Shea or Steyn, is there a possibility that either could be arrested and shipped to Saudi Arabia from say, Malaysia, Frankfurt, Toronto, or even Washington?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTalk about quaint:
"These rights may be unalienable in Western thought".
Oh, yeah? You mean, in the face of executive mandates to force religious peoples to violate their conscience when issuing health insurance policies?
Then again, maybe they're no longer so "unalienable" in western thought.
To the political left, such rights seem downright alien!
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse