Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Corner

The one and only.

Print   |  Text
 

Debunking HHS Mandate Myths

Via the Becket Fund:

Myth #1: “28 states — more than half — in the country have laws with contraception coverage mandates.”

Truth: The federal mandate actually goes much deeper. In states where there are mandates religious organizations can simply opt out by self-insuring or dropping prescription drug coverage. The federal mandate does not allow any of these alternatives, and does not protect our religious liberty.

 

Myth #2: “If you receive federal funding you have to comply by federal rules. You can’t have your cake and eat it too!”

Truth: The mandate forces every group health plan in America to cover these drugs whether the group gets federal funds or not. There is no opt-out. The government is making religious groups choose between offering services they believe to be immoral or closing their doors. That would have the terrible consequences of withdrawing charitable religious organizations from our country’s social safety net. Who will bear the brunt of this backwards policy? The poor, the homeless, the sick and the hungry.

 

Myth #3: These drugs don’t cause an abortion! Catholics should learn a little bit about biology.

Truth: Biology does not dictate theology. Reasonable people may disagree about when a pregnancy begins, but for individuals who believe that human life begins at the moment of fertilization, not implantation, these drugs destroy innocent life. More specifically, the mandate requires religious organizations to cover Plan B, the morning after pill, and Ella, the week after pill, both of which can terminate a human life after fertilization. Also, RU486, A.K.A. the abortion drug, is currently being tested, and if approved by the FDA as an emergency contraceptive would automatically be mandated as well.

 

 

Myth #4: Employees who do not share the same faith of their religious employer should not be deprived of health care because of their employer’s religious beliefs.

Truth: Religious groups believe in promoting the well-being and health of their employees and students, which is why they provide health insurance; but as part of their religious commitment, they cannot cover services that are inconsistent with their religious faith. Employees are free to purchase these services even if they are not covered under a religious employer’s plan. And employees and students at religious organizations know — when they accept a job or enroll as a student — they do so at a religious institution that takes seriously its faith commitment.

 

Myth #5: The federal mandate actually protects women’s health because it increases access to free birth control.

Truth: Access isn’t the issue. 9 out of 10 employer-based insurance plans already cover these services. There is no need for the government to force religious groups to provide these services against their religious convictions.

 

Watch the videos Becket has created to further illustrate the truth here.

 

New on The Corner. . .


COMMENTS   7

EXPAND  

truth bomb
   03/05/12 08:08

The insurance coverage people receive is a part of their compensation. In essence, the employees PAY for the insurance, NOT the employers. It is a transaction made on the employees behalf to take advantage of group discounts and avoid income tax, but it is still essentially the employees who are paying for the coverage. All of this baloney that religious institutions shouldn't pay for things they don't agree with misses this. What if a non-Mormon worked at Brigham Young University. Could Brigham Young University refuse to pay him unless he could prove he didn't spend his paycheck on booze?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/05/12 12:47

So you advocate completely decoupling insurance from employment then? So that employees can be completely free to purchase their own insurance with their own money according to their own needs and desires?

I'd go for that.

I'm home sick with bronchitis today and my employer-chosen insurance has denied one of the meds the ER doc prescribed last night (how he's supposed to get pre-approval at 11:30pm on Sunday night while his patient wheezes and coughs is not explained in my benefits pamphlet).

Knowing that, as an asthmatic, I'm prone to respiratory problems I'd happily forgo things I'll never need like contraceptives, drug addiction counseling, mental health services, etc. and choose a plan with enhanced coverage for respiratory drugs.

Alternately I'd go for a meaningful health savings account -- the current version is a joke.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Tony May
   03/05/12 18:03

That is not entirely accurate.

First, most employees do not pay the full amount of the coverage but only a portion, an usually the smaller portion.

Second, the contract is between the insurance company and the employer. The employer is the one on the hook for the premiums. Now the employer has the option to charge the employee for some or all of the costs of the insurance and most do charge some. Keep in mind, if the employer fails to pay the bill then the insurance company can only go after the employer. This shows you who the actual purchaser is. It is not the employee.

I hear you when you say in "essence" the employees pay the premiums (assuming the employer is charging the full amount) but essence doesn't work with the law. It is those pesky little technical operations that determine who the purchaser of the insurance policy is.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/05/12 08:09

Where's the part about waging war on half the population? I'm on all the mailing lists but I still haven't been invited to that War Room.

Seriously, just to remind yourself how skewed the pop culture account of this is: the information on this fact sheet represents the matters directly at issue from the HHS diktat. But when you watch TV or read newspapers, do these facts get attention in any way proportionate to the garment-rending theatrics performed by the statists? Or is their mention quickly dismissed to make room for diversionary so stories?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/05/12 08:59

Myth #6 -- Birth control is related to women's health.

Truth:
A. Pregnancy is not a disease. It is a normal, healthy condition for an adult female.

B. There are long-term health risks associated with the use of powerful, artificial hormones to disrupt the natural functioning of a woman's body.

C. Sterility, natural or imposed, is unhealthy for the species.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/05/12 09:34

Myth #6: this debate won't be devastating to the GOP in November.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/06/12 01:06

Good stuff. Thanks Becket Fund!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact