Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Afghan and Iraqi Woes



Text  



From my most recent NRO article, on some serious problems in U.S. foreign policy: “Though comparisons to Vietnam are nonsense, because the United States was completely militarily successful in Iraq — with volunteer armed forces on a congressionally authorized mission, with fewer than 10 percent of the casualties in Vietnam, and with the government it left behind not under full-scale invasion by another country, as South Vietnam was — it is not clear that the U.S. will ultimately have much more to show for its effort in Iraq than it does for Vietnam. Nor is it clear that there was any point to the Iraq War after Saddam was got rid of. Baghdad recently successfully hosted an Arab League meeting, though twelve of the 22 member countries did not attend because they think Maliki is too much under the influence of Iran, which is not why the United States fought the war there.”

Whether you agree or disagree, your comments are, as always, most welcome.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review