Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Obama’s Burn Rate Problem



Text  



Barack Obama raised a whopping $54 million in May. But his campaign spent even more: $69 million. 

Karl Rove has a devastating critique of how fast the Obama campaign is running through their cash in today’s Journal:

 

Compare the 2012 Obama re-election campaign with the 2004 Bush re-election campaign. Mr. Obama’s campaign spent 25% of what it raised in the second quarter of 2011, while Mr. Bush’s campaign spent only 9% in the second quarter of 2003. In the third quarter it was 46% for Obama versus 26% for Bush; for the fourth quarter it was 57% versus 40%. In January 2012 the Obama campaign spent 158% of what it raised, while the Bush campaign spent 60% in January 2004.

The Obama campaign’s high burn rate doesn’t come from large television buys, phone banks or mail programs that could be immediately stopped. It appears to result instead from huge fixed costs for a big staff and higher-than-expected fund-raising outlays. These are much tougher to unwind or delay. Left unaltered, they generally lead to even more frantic efforts to both raise money and stop other spending.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review