Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

‘The Egyptian Kansas’ -- Hateful Islamophobia at the New York Times



Text  



My column this weekend is about the unravelling situation in the Muslim Brotherhood’s new Egypt, where another Islamist general got a big promotion this week in that multi-billion-dollar American-funded military that we were told was going to stop Egypt from going the way of the Muslim Brotherhood. I was stunned reading the report, though, to find that the New York Times seems to have been mugged by reality. From the column:

The Times report is very enlightening. As NR readers know, I’ve been arguing for the better part of a decade that the Islamic democracy project is a fool’s errand because Islamist ideology, far from being an outlier, is the mainstream Islam of the Middle East. I even wrote a book, The Grand Jihad, that both explains Islamic supremacism and illustrates that this ideology’s chief proponent — the Muslim Brotherhood, backed by deep Saudi pockets — rightly perceives itself as the avant-garde of a dynamic mass movement. Other than a few appearances on the bestseller list, which I’m sure must have pained the Gray Lady, the book was studiously ignored by the Times. Elsewhere, it was pooh-poohed as Islamophobic tripe. Imagine my surprise, then, to find that my theory, virtually overnight, has gone from an object of ridicule to a truth so undeniable it warrants judicial notice.

Now, the Times tells us:

Samer Shehata, a professor of Arab politics at Georgetown University, said American policy makers would be naïve to think that the positions held by Mr. Morsi and the Brotherhood — including criticisms of the United States and strong support for the Palestinians — represented fringe thinking.

On those issues, “the Brotherhood is the Egyptian Kansas,” said Professor Shehata. Their positions on foreign policy “reflect rather than oppose what the Egyptian center is thinking,” he said.

Well, I’ll be darned . . .



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review