Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Who Needs the Marines When You’ve Got ‘Same-Sex Domestic Partners’ of Government Employees For Security?



Text  



As David says, “words fail” . . . so I’ll just pass along the CNSNews report without further commentary about the Obama administration’s priorities in assessing security needs in Benghazi, the notorious jihadist hotbed that has long been one of the most dangerous spots on the planet for Americans:

In the months leading up to the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, the U.S. Embassy in Libya was seeking to hire two bodyguards with “limited” English language skills at salaries of about $13,000 per year.

Job descriptions for these openings that the U.S. Embassy in Libya posted online said the State Department would give preference in filling them to qualified U.S. citizens who were family members of U.S. government employees. The job descriptions explicitly stated that this included the “same-sex domestic partners” of U.S. government employees.

In addition to the two bodyguards, the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, Libya was also seeking a security guard, a surveillance detection specialist, a chauffeur for the consulate in Benghazi and a “Senior Guard” for the Local Guard Force working to secure the embassy.

One of the duties of the Local Guard Force that this Senior Guard would join was “providing limited emergency response in the event of a terrorist attack, criminal incident, or major accident.”

All the job descriptions for these positions were posted online by the embassy, and all, except the security guard position, said that applicants needed to be fluent in Arabic. None required full fluency in English. All of them said the State Department would give preference in filling the position to a qualified U.S. citizen who was the “same-sex domestic partner” of a U.S. government employee.

The rest is here.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review