The Corner

The one and only.

Mother Earth, Mother Jones


Over at Mother Jones, Kevin Drum sees my suggestion that “some” of the (great deal of) money that the world spends — much of it on a basis that fails any reasonable cost/benefit analysis — on trying to tamper with the climate might usefully be redeployed in spending on a little asteroid insurance, and argues that it might feature as a quote of the year, possibly (just possibly), not in a good way.

Note that “some,” by the way.

His headline:

Frying the Planet is OK as Long as We Protect it From Asteroids

Bit of a jump, eh, Kevin?

Oh well, it’s all part of the knockabout of debate. That said, perhaps Kevin ought to take a look at this piece by Tim Murphy. It begins as follows:

If you believe the folks at NASA—and really, why shouldn’t you?—it’s only a matter of when, not if, we need someone like Dr. Bong Wie to save the human race from a civilization-destroying catastrophe. . . . Wie is the director of the Asteroid Deflection Research Center at Iowa State University, the only institution in the United States dedicated to the deflection of what NASA calls Near-Earth Objects (NEOs)—”asteroids” to the rest of us….

In the fight against NEOs, the biggest obstacle so far hasn’t come from the cosmos; it’s been in Washington…Even now, NASA spends just 0.2 percent of its budget on asteroid research; Wie has received $600,000 in grants.

Good stuff.

And where was it published?

Mother Jones. On Friday. 


Sign up for free NR e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review