Bradley Manning: What’s It To Ya?
Scott Shackford at Reason.com makes the classic content-free “what’s it to ya” argument about Bradley Manning. Regarding Mr. Shackford’s considerable insights into the biological inaccuracies of Finding Nemo, I can reply only that in the course of arguing that Bradley Manning is not a woman I did not have sufficient space to argue that he also is not a clownfish. It seemed too obvious to require attention at the time, but I seem to have been mistaken. I regret this oversight and would like to note that Mr. Manning also is not a flying squirrel, an emu, a giant geode, or an alternative proof of Fermat’s last theorem.