President Obama has awarded a kind of most-favored-nation status to the Islamic government of Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, pushing at the outset of his first presidential term for a “model partnership” with Turkey.
And the seeds of Obama’s erratic and misguided Middle East policies can be partially situated in this desire to court Erdogan as a responsible leader in the region.
My nearly two weeks on the Syria-Turkey border in late September and early October revealed the contrary to be true. In short, al-Qaeda jihadists have wide latitude in Turkey to access Syria’s territory.
Moreover, the American Enterprise Institute Middle East expert Michael Rubin’s article titled “Turkey, not Syria, to blame for sectarianism in Turkey” exposes the ways in which Erdogan stokes ethnic and religious divisions.
The peerless Middle East historian Bernard Lewis wrote that his time in Turkey made him ”more keenly aware of the immensity of the task” that the nation had in order “to create a secular, modern and democratic nation-state.” Turkey’s increasingly reactionary policies do not bode well for its continued membership in NATO. It is all the more perplexing that the European Union still considers Erdogan’s government fit for membership in the EU. The Obama administration also seems unwilling to confront Erdogan, and an inability to counter Erdogan’s volatility will do real harm to U.S. interests.
— Benjamin Weinthal is a Berlin-based fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Follow Benjamin on [email protected].