Something for everyone in today’s report. Nonfarm payrolls increased a tepid 113,000 in January, the second straight month with payroll gains noticeably under consensus expectations. Private-sector gains were a healthier 142,000, but that’s still below the average of 191,000 in the past year.
Although the weather appeared to have held down payrolls in December, Labor Department data say the number of people who couldn’t work due to weather was smaller than usual in January. However, the household survey that generates that weather effect also shows an overall gain of 638,000 in civilian employment for the month. As a result, despite the labor force increasing by 523,000, the unemployment rate ticked down again to 6.6 percent, very close to the Federal Reserve’s 6.5 percent threshold for starting to discuss rate hikes.
Like the headline data, the details of the report were also mixed. Every January report includes an annual “benchmark” revision for payrolls and this one revised payrolls higher in March 2013 by 369,000. However, all of the revision was due to recategorizing some household employees as payroll workers.
For January 2014, total hours worked increased 0.1 percent and are up 2.1 percent from a year ago. Combing that increase with a 1.9 percent gain in average hourly earnings shows that total cash earnings are up 4 percent from a year ago, which is more than enough to keep pushing consumer spending higher.
As we always remind our readers, the labor market could and would be doing better with a better set of public policies. But it is still improving. In the past year nonfarm payrolls have grown at an average monthly rate of 187,000 while civilian employment is up 153,000 per month. The soft growth in payrolls the past two months is not the start of a new weaker trend. We expect payroll gains to reaccelerate sometime in the next couple of months.
(As an aside, Bloomberg ranks about 90 economists a month for forecasting nonfarm payrolls. Over the past two years, the economics team at First Trust — the financial-services firm where I am deputy chief economist — is rated No. 1 in accuracy.)