Thursday was the deadline for filing public comments on the IRS’s proposed rule to restrict political activity by 501(c)(4) organizations. Unsurprisingly, the IRS website was flooded with last minute comments.
When the bytes had settled, the agency discovered it had received a total of more than 140,000 comments. The vast majority condemned the new rules.
Our joint comment pointed out that the IRS lacks statutory authority to restrict the political activity of 501(c)(4)s and that the proposed rules do not respect Supreme Court precedent. They would “confuse regulated entities” and “seriously undermine the First Amendment rights and protections of the Constitution.” Bizarrely, some of the language proposed by the IRS is “almost identical to a provision of federal campaign finance law that the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional” in Citizens United.
On Wednesday the House approved, by a 243–176 margin, a bill sponsored by House Ways and Means Committee chairman Dave Camp (R., Mich.) that would delay the proposed rules for one year. However no one expects Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) to let that bill come to a vote in the Upper Chamber. White House advisers have also already threatened a veto.
It’s a naked attempt by those holding the reins of political power to censor their opponents’ political speech and quash their political activity.