Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Dictators



Text  



From a reader:

Dear Mr. Goldberg,

In your Dec. 30 column you mentioned the BBC’s directive not to call Saddam Hussein a “dictator.” An amusing contrast is their readiness to use that term with others such as Augusto Pinochet. Here are a few examples that Google turned up:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3237740.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3186871.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/country_profiles/1222905.stm
The last link is a brief history of Chile which has a “Pinochet dictatorship” section. I was curious whether they used “dictator” in other country profiles. Not for Iraq. In Cuba’s they do, but not for Castro, only for one of his predecessors.

I think it’s perfectly accurate to call both Hussein and Pinochet dictators. However, if one was requiring strict criteria for using this subjective characterization, Pinochet would much less qualify as a dictator than Hussein, e.g., level of dissent allowed, domestic body count, and the degree which others in his junta limited his one-man rule.



Text