Krugman Vs. Barro Vs. Bartlett

by Steven F. Hayward

A worthwhile voice to consult on these economic controversies is my AEI
colleague John Makin, whose monthly Economic Outlook (available here) is widely read, in
part as John calls the macro shots for some very successful hedge funds.
In his most recent Economic Outlook, “As Good As It Gets,” John argues
thus about the deficit:

“The loudest cries of criticism have been reserved for the sharp
transition from a U.S. budget surplus of over $200 billion in the 2000
fiscal year to a $380 billion deficit in 2003. Conservatives and
liberals alike are already decrying an expected budget deficit of $500
billion in the current fiscal year. Criticism of rising budget deficits,
an old habit among would-be policy wonks trying to sound profound and
prudent, is just silly at this point. It would be like criticizing
firefighters for pumping half the water out of a pond to put out a fire.
Sure, there is less water in reserve for another fire, but why have the
water there in the first place if you don’t intend to use it to put out
fires? Going from a budget surplus of 2 percent of GDP to a deficit,
still below 4 percent of GDP, is appropriate in an economy with excess
capacity, especially when much of the swing comes from two rounds of
demand-boosting tax cuts that simultaneously improve resource

The Corner

The one and only.