Google+
Close

The Corner

The one and only.

Barnett Vs. Bainbridge



Text  



As Ramesh noted href=”http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/04_05_09_corner-
archive.asp#031482″>here
, I am indeed involved in an extended on-line
debate with Steve Bainbridge, that I think is proving to be unusually
revealing of both of our positions, and of the issues surrounding different
approaches to constitutional interpretation generally. This spontaneous
exchange highlights how blogging is changing the nature of and audience for
academic discourse. Interested readers can find links to
Steve’s posts, the first of which was entitled, “Should Conservatives by
Cheerful,” in the following entries by me (which are listed in chronological
order):

href=”http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_05_07.shtml#1083928263″>Should
Conservatives Be Uninformed?

href=”http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_05_07.shtml#1083955713″>Should
Conservatives Be Confused?

The
Founders on Democratic Majoritarianism

href=”http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_05_07.shtml#1084246714″>Stephen
Bainbridge Replies

The
Stubbornness of Facts: Judicial Conservatives and the Ninth Amendment

href=”http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_05_07.shtml#1084398394″>Abortion
& the 14th Amendment

href=”http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2004_05_07.shtml#1084424207″>Originali
st Sacrifices



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review