|
hile
ostentatiously pursuing an "investigation" of the Marc Rich pardon (which
will lead precisely nowhere), Mary Jo White, the U.S. attorney for the
Southern District of New York, has stubbornly refused to indict top Democratic
and union officials directly implicated in a money-laundering scheme uncovered
by her own office some years ago.
In what is now called the Teamsters Swap Scandal, prosecutors working
for Mary Jo White won three guilty pleas from top Teamsters aides back
in 1997. Two years later, the Teamsters' former political director, William
Hamilton, was convicted for his role in the kickback scheme. But for four
years now, the Big Kahunas implicated in the money-swap operation have
been largely forgotten by White's office. One big fish studiously ignored
by White is the current chairman of the Democratic National Committee
and Clinton pal, Terry McAuliffe.
At the center of the money-laundering scheme was Ron Carey, who had been
anointed Teamsters president by "the most ethical administration in history"
as part of an ingenious plan to "clean up" the Teamsters. When Teamsters
legacy James Hoffa Jr. later challenged Carey for the union presidency
in 1996, Carey's aides and perhaps Carey himself decided
to give the Carey campaign a boost using general union funds.
As was proved by the government, both in oversight and criminal investigations,
the Carey campaign repeatedly arranged for the Teamsters to make huge
contributions to various liberal and Democratic groups, and then those
groups would funnel the money right back not to the Teamsters,
but to the Carey campaign. This is on the order of the IRS commissioner
using tax revenues to buy himself a Porsche.
After sitting on evidence for four years that implicated Carey, the tough-talking
White finally indicted him only days after George W. Bush was sworn in
as president. But even a Republican in the White House hasn't prompted
Clinton-appointed White to blink in her intractable refusal to pursue
McAuliffe.
This is somewhat startling inasmuch as White's own office adduced testimony
during the Hamilton trial naming McAuliffe as a party to the money-laundering
operation. Democratic party official Richard Sullivan testified that his
former boss, Terry McAuliffe, outlined a plan to him that would allow
the Democratic National Committee to participate in the Teamsters' evidently
well-known kickback scheme. Sullivan said that McAuliffe told him the
Democratic party would be rewarded with up to a million dollars in campaign
contributions from the Teamsters if the Democrats could find someone to
donate $100,000 to the Carey campaign.
(Though completion of the scheme is not required for a criminal offense,
the Teamsters came through with their quid. The donor located by the Democrats
for their quo backed out at the last minute.)
Though Sullivan later told Senate investigators he did not view this arrangement
as money laundering but rather as a way to "help raise money from the
union," Sen. Arlen Specter informed Sullivan that he was using language
that "is the equivalent of a quid pro quo."
After Sullivan's shocking trial testimony, even the New York Times
was forced to admit that Sullivan's description of McAuliffe's role was
"troubling." While trying to mitigate the force of Sullivan's testimony
by incorrectly claiming that he had been given a "no-prosecution" deal
from the prosecutor (correction issued 10 days later), the Times
referred vaguely to "some judgment calls" that Mary Jo White was going
to have to make with regard to McAuliffe. An indictment seemed imminent.
That was in 1999. We're still waiting. Indeed, according to McAuliffe's
lawyer, Richard Ben-Veniste, McAuliffe was given "assurances" three years
ago from Mary Jo White's office that he "was not a target of the investigation."
Meanwhile, three other Democratic or union officials have given sworn
statements to Senate investigators also fingering McAuliffe as a player
in the Teamsters' money-swap scandal.
Not only that, but the three Carey campaign aides who pleaded guilty to
felonies back in 1997 still have not been sentenced. Federal judges do
not normally wait more than three years to sentence felons unless
the U.S. attorney has requested that sentencing be delayed.
Why is Mary Jo White blocking their sentencing?
Prosecutors will sometimes request that sentencing be deferred when a
convict is cooperating so that the full extent of the cooperation can
be known by the court prior to sentencing. But four years is enough time
to have these guys describe the history of the world since the Earth cooled
to say nothing of a simple money-laundering scheme. Either McAuliffe
was involved or he wasn't. Does White need four years to ask the convicted
Teamsters aides that?
It took Al Gore's defeat to get an indictment of Ron Carey. It seems it's
going to take the man who defeated him to remove New York's own Janet
Reno from her office to shut down the Democrat protection racquet being
run out of the Southern District of New York.
|