|
his
week the Supreme Court upheld the right of religious groups to participate
in the beautiful mosaic of afterschool activities. No new territory was
broken: The case was almost identical to another case in which the Supreme
Court reversed the exact same court years ago. This was massive resistance.
Justice Clarence
Thomas remarked on the oddity of having to reverse the same court twice,
noting that while the appellate courts aren't required to cite all the
Supreme Court's precedents, they might want to cite the last time they
were reversed on the same facts.
At least the 6-3
decision gives us an accurate count of the atheists on the court, probably
as accurate as my dream of giving them all polygraph tests someday. ("Do
you believe in a Higher Being ... no, seriously.") Concerned someone might
be reading Leviticus during school hours, Justice David Souter dissented
in a hair-splitting exegesis about the precise time classes let out (2:56
p.m.), vs. the time the organizers would enter school property (2:30 p.m.).
The New York
Times's obligatory hysterical denunciation of the decision revealingly
complained: "(C)hildren that young are unlikely to discern that the religious
message of authority figures who come to the school each day to teach
does not carry the school's endorsement."
It is simply taken
for granted that it's desirable for children to revere "authority figures"
at government schools. Normally those authority figures are teaching the
youngsters to put condoms on zucchini or training them in the catechism
of recycling. Sending a mixed message about government "authority figures"
might interfere with the state's ability to turn small children into Good
Germans inculcated in the liberal religion.
It's well past time
for liberalism to be declared a religion and banned from public schools.
Allowing Christians to be one of many afterschool groups induces hysteria
not just because liberals hate religion. It's because the public school
is their temple. Children must be taught to love Big Brother, welcoming
him to take over our schools, our bank accounts, our property, even our
toilet bowls.
We're told the First
Amendment requires a separation of church and state, which, just as an
incidental matter, is completely false. The whole point of the Constitution
is to separate the federal government from the individual.
In keeping with
the general theme, the First Amendment provides that Congress cannot establish
a religion -- but nor can it stop the states from establishing religions.
That's why it says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion." Dear Congress: You may be eligible for a free country. You
do nothing.
The only thing that
tempers my annoyance with the canard about states not being allowed to
establish religions is imagining the kind of established religion we'd
have in New York. We'd be doing daily devotionals to Saint Hillary.
Still, it is a fact
that when the First Amendment was ratified, several states had established
religions. Fortunately for the burgeoning minority religions in those
states, the established religions were things like "Episcopalianism" and
"Congregationalism" rather than "Liberalism."
It's hard to imagine
now, but before the official government religion was liberalism -- devoted
to class warfare, ethnic hatred and intolerance -- Americans were kind
to one another. They managed to get along even without ACLU lawsuits.
Thus, when there were enough practitioners of other faiths in a state
to be bothered by the established religion, the majority just disestablished
themselves.
Back to the New
Country: Two malcontents at the Virginia Military Institute recently sued
to ban VMI's tradition of saying a non-denominational prayer at mealtime.
The cadets are not required to recite the prayer or even bow their heads.
Merely having to stand while listening to an invocation of God is apparently
very upsetting for them. (I'd hate to see these guys under fire.)
A typical rendition
of the VMI dinner prayer goes like this: "Almighty God, we give our thanks
for VMI, for its reputation, spirit and ideals. Let your favor continue
toward our school and your grace be abundantly supplied to the Corps.
Now, O God, we receive this food and share this meal together with thanksgiving."
It doesn't get any
more sectarian than that. How about: "Designer of the Universe (if you're
out there) ..."
Religious people
keep cheerfully going back and trying to formulate some prayer that won't
make liberals angry. But the problem won't go away. No prayer that assumes
a belief in a Higher Being will ever be acceptable. God has no part in
the religion of sex education, environmentalism, feminism, Marxism and
loving Big Brother.
In a totally unsurprising
development, liberals finally suspended their opposition to the death
penalty in the case of Timothy McVeigh. He was the sworn enemy of the
established religion of Big Brother. Too bad he never stumbled into one
of those afterschool Christian meetings.
|