Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Critical Condition

NRO’s health-care blog.


Print   |  Text
 

Missed Hit by Mitt

Former governor Mitt Romney may very well have hoped he could put health care behind him with his major speech in Ann Arbor, but judging from the results so far of the National Review Online poll, it’s clear he still has a lot of work to do: By a margin of about seven to one, readers said they thought the speech hurt him.

It’s hard to hate Obamacare and love Romneycare. For example, Romney continued to defend the individual mandate — the most despised part of Obamacare — as right for Massachusetts but wrong for the country.

Four years after reform, Massachusetts still has the highest health-insurance premiums in the country. For small employers, the rise is about 14 percent beyond those in the rest of the nation.

And it’s increasingly difficult to get a doctor’s appointment. A recent survey by the Massachusetts Medical Society reveals that fewer than half of the state’s primary-care practices are accepting new patients, and the average wait time to get an appointment with an internist is 48 days. The result: The use of hospital emergency rooms in Massachusetts by people seeking routine care has increased. This was another problem Romneycare was supposed to fix.

The five-point plan that Governor Romney outlined to structure the health-reform initiative he would undertake as president is sound and based upon solid principles. But it’s hard to see how voters will give him a chance unless he admits that the health plan he developed for Massachusetts went seriously wrong.

He was emphatic about calling for repeal of Obamacare and said he will issue an executive order paving the way for the states to get a waiver from the health-overhaul law while Congress works to repeal it. 

But you can’t use an executive order to wipe out two massive new federal entitlement programs, $550 billion in new and higher taxes, a vast expansion of Medicaid, and federal mandates on individuals, businesses, and the states. Waivers are not a solution. 

In a political debate, President Obama would be sure to point out that there is little contrast between Romney’s call for these initial waivers for the states and the president’s call to give states an early waiver to implement Obamacare their own way.

Full repeal is the only solution. Earlier this year, the Republican House passed a repeal bill within a few weeks of taking power. If there were a majority in the Senate supporting repeal, then a new president could have a bill to sign on his desk within a month or two of taking office.

Voters needed to see more contrast today, and they would demand it in a general-election battle.

New on Critical Condition. . .


COMMENTS   4

EXPAND  

   05/12/11 20:32

Romney's problem is not that "the health plan he developed for Massachusetts went seriously wrong." The problem is that he developed a governmentally controlled health care system in the first place. Romney is already blaming Democrats for the failure of Romneycare, but those same problems would have arisen no matter who was in office at the time. The law of unintended consequences applies to both progressive, and "conservative" central planners.

It is a mistake for the government to control any sector of the economy, whether at the federal, state, county, municipal or township level. Anyone who thinks that the answer to poor central planning is "more conservative" plans, is no real conservative.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
doom161
   05/12/11 21:58

Romney won't begin to put health care behind him until he stops backing Obamacare (oops... Romneycare).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/13/11 21:33

Exactly so, GaryM, and Romney's failure to understand this means that we conservatives should not support him (like NR and I both did in 2008). Our standard bearer must understand the virtues of free-market economics. We can't affort another Bush, McCain, or, sadly, Romney.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/13/11 23:27

I like Mitt, but I can no longer support him after this speech. As a Republican governor with veto-proof Dem majorities in both houses of the Mass legislature, Mitt Romney committed a rear-guard action against a far worse bill than what Romneycare ultimately became.

This could be his golden apple. He should disavow the final product outright, declare it a failure and call for a full repeal of O-Care. That he fails to do so shows that his heart just isn't in the right place, nor in the Right place.

Practicing medicine in Massachusetts was supposed to get EASIER under Romneycare. It hasn't. Being a patient in Massachusetts was supposed to get better under Romneycare. It hasn't. Buying health insurance in Massachusetts was supposed to be less dear under Romneycare. It isn't.

Please, fellow conservatives, let's do all we can to end Mr Romney's campaign before he becomes the next McCain. Mitt's a good guy but his moment has passed. He blew it, and we can't allow him to be the next sacrificial lamb.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact