Washington Bulletin
The Goldberg File
For The Record
Outrage du Jour
Soapbox
Our Current Issue
Subscribe to NR
The Vibe
NR Extra
NR Book Reviews
Garbage In, Garbage Out
Movie Reviews
WFB's Word of the Day
NR Archives
Contact Us
NR Online

"An entertaining mix of reporting and sharp political analysis." --Vin Weber

Updated 8/4/99 11:20 PM

TIME OUT OF MIND
How liberal is Time magazine? At least on guns, it's not making much of an attempt to hide its politics. This week's issue uses the Atlanta massacre as the hook for yet another anti-gun onslaught: a two-page summary of recent political victories for gun control, a five-page paean to the ATF and the Brady Bill, and finally a two-page essay by Roger Rosenblatt titled "Get Rid of the Damned Things."

Rosenblatt deserves some credit here: It is at least possible to argue with a straight face that banning guns would reduce crimes of violence, which is not the case with all the baby-step gun controls that are actually being proposed in legislatures. And Rosenblatt, unlike other anti-gun journalists, is willing to acknowledge that the example of Switzerland and the research of Gary Kleck and John Lott Jr. offer evidence that gun ownership can reduce crime and that gun regulations may increase crime. But his response is disappointing. There isn't one. Having suggested that his pet idea would not work and might backfire, he just goes merrily on his way. Evidently arguments aren't needed when the polls are on your side.

Not that he cites any. None of the stories in Time mention any movement in any poll to illustrate the "Nationwide Backlash" they trumpet. According to a post-Littleton Gallup poll, 58 percent of the public opposes the ban on civilian ownership of handguns that Rosenblatt wants. There hasn't even been much of a backlash in Colorado: Support for a permissive conceal-carry law in media polls there was statistically identical in February (66%) and in May (65%).

When the Washington Post wants to make the case for a backlash anyway, its method is to run story after story referring to "poll after poll" but never quite providing any specific findings. Rosenblatt deals with the problem of not having any evidence by implicitly positing a mystical bond with the public. He writes, "My guess, in fact, is. . . that the great majority of Americans are saying they favor gun control when they really mean gun banishment. . . . I think we're prepared to get rid of the damned things entirely-the handguns, the semis and the automatics." Well then. If a say-so is all it takes, why should we feel bound to look at any numbers? We think that when Americans say government is too big, it's because they really want to get rid of Medicare and privatize the Federal Reserve. Stay tuned for news of this groundswell.

For a selection of recent Washington Bulletins click here

If you would like to receive the Washington Bulletin via e-mail, please send an e-mail message to majordomo@us.net. The first line in the body of the message should read: "subscribe washingtonbulletin". In order to ensure that you are not accidentally subscribed, you will receive a reply message with a confirmation number, to which you must reply to complete the subscription process.

To unsubscribe leave the subject line blank and have the first line in the body of the message read: "unsubscribe washingtonbulletin".

Updated By:
Ramesh Ponnuru - Senior Editor
John J. Miller - National Political Reporter
Kate Dwyer - Editorial Associate

nowavail.gif (4588 bytes)


Washington Bulletin | For the Record Online | Outrage du Jour
The Goldberg File | Soapbox | Current Issue | Subscribe to NR
Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Garbage In, Garbage Out
The Vibe | NR Extra | Bill Buckley's Word of the Day | Bookstore
NR Archive | Mission Statement | Contact Us | The Legal Stuff

National Review
215 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10016
(212) 679 7330

National Review is a townhall.com Member Organization

" visibility=hidden onload="moveToAbsolute(ph1.pageX, ph1.pageY); visibility='show';" clip="468,60">