
 |
|
Updated 11/13/98
5:55PM
STARR POWER
Democrats privately worry that Ken Starr's testimony on Thursday to the
House Judiciary Committee will be crisp, clear, and compelling. His
popularity has nowhere to go but up. The concern is that his public
performance will make him, if not a more sympathetic figure, at least a
more reasonable one--and certainly allow him to counter the wrongheaded
image that he's a sex-obsessed witch-hunter.
So, behind the scenes, Judiciary Committee Democrats have done another
U-turn: now they don't want Starr to testify. They probably can't
prevent it now, but don't be surprised if Democrats start speaking out
against the testimony. (The hearings are going on too long, the voters
have said they don't want impeachment, etc.) If bombs start falling in
Iraq, they will urge a delay so that "Americans can stand united behind
their President." Watch the Sunday morning shows and see what's said: If
Democrats belabor these points, it will mean they're edgy.
SEÑOR LIVINGSTON
The elevation of Bob Livingston to Speaker has inspired some low-volume
conservative grousing--not for love of Newt Gingrich (the right is
mostly glad he's gone), but because his Appropriations Chairman
management style suggests he'll avoid certain kinds of fights. On at
least one issue, however, Livingston represents an enormous and
immediate improvement: English language policy. "Livingston has been a
good friend on English and Puerto Rico and he seems to understand these
issues a lot better than Newt did," says Jim Boulet of English First.
Livingston has gone out of his way to testify against bilingual
education, and because his adopted daughter is Chinese, he approaches
the subject with a credibility few can match. Moreover, Livingston was
an active opponent of the pro-statehood bill for Puerto Rico that passed
the House by one vote earlier this year. (Gingrich was actively in favor
of making Puerto Rico the 51st state.)
Republicans will need to distinguish themselves from Democrats on
several defining issues next year. Memo to Speaker Livingston: Think
about making this one a priority.
For a selection of recent Washington Bulletins
click here
If you would like to receive the Washington Bulletin via e-mail, please
send an e-mail message to majordomo@us.net. The first line in the body
of the message should read: "subscribe washingtonbulletin".
In order to ensure that you are not accidentally subscribed, you will
receive a reply message with a confirmation number, to which you must
reply to complete the subscription process.
Updated By:
Ramesh Ponnuru - Articles Editor
John J. Miller - National Political Reporter
Kate Dwyer - Editorial Associate
Washington Bulletin | For the Record Online | Outrage du Jour The Goldberg File | Soapbox | Current Issue | Subscribe to NR Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Garbage In, Garbage Out The Vibe | NR Extra | Bill Buckley's Word of the Day | Bookstore NR Archive | Mission Statement | Contact Us | The Legal Stuff
National Review 215 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10016 (212) 679 7330
National Review is a
Member Organization
|