![]() |
|
|
|
Updated 11/23/98
6:40PM
THE BIG LIE
Three times during Starr's testimony last week, Democrats asked Starr
questions that they should have known were false. Rep. Sheila Jackson
Lee (D., Tex.) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) both asked whether
IWF ever has retained Starr's services in the preparation of an amicus
brief for the Paula Jones lawsuit against President Clinton (weren't
they listening to each other?). Both times Starr was able to answer in
the negative. Democratic counsel Abbe Lowell asked a similar question
about whether Starr had ever provided "free legal advice" the group. The
truth is that Starr met with IWF to discuss the question of presidential
immunity in a civil suit. IWF never filed a brief in the matter, (the
ACLU did,) and certainly never hired Starr to do it for them.
The IWF-Starr conspiracy theory was born last year when the New York
Times editorial page reported, incorrectly, on a link between Starr and
the IWF. The IWF wrote a letter correcting the record, which was
printed. The Times editorial page later repeated its error, but soon ran
a correction. Then the Times ran front-page article leveling the
charges, which it corrected incorrectly. IWF's Barbara Ledeen tried
repeatedly to have the Times correct its correction before Starr's
testimony, but the paper failed to do so. To add to the big lie, other
outlets such as Roll Call, the New York Observer, and James Carville's
latest book also have misreported the story.
That's incredibly useful for White House propagandists, who work hard at
spinning the Liar-in-Chief's message right down to the point of
influencing the guest lists for MSNBC chat shows that nobody watches.
Perhaps one of these programs, looking for a new angle on the White
House scandal, should explore why the Democrats keep getting their facts
wrong about the IWF and Ken Starr.
VIEWS IN FOCUS
This is one kind of assimilation we definitely could do without.
For a selection of recent Washington Bulletins click here If you would like to receive the Washington Bulletin via e-mail, please send an e-mail message to majordomo@us.net. The first line in the body of the message should read: "subscribe washingtonbulletin". In order to ensure that you are not accidentally subscribed, you will receive a reply message with a confirmation number, to which you must reply to complete the subscription process.
Updated By:
The Goldberg File | Soapbox | Current Issue | Subscribe to NR Movie Reviews | Book Reviews | Garbage In, Garbage Out The Vibe | NR Extra | Bill Buckley's Word of the Day | Bookstore NR Archive | Mission Statement | Contact Us | The Legal Stuff
National Review |