|
|
|||
|
12/18/00
4:10 p.m. By NRs John J. Miller & Ramesh Ponnuru |
|||
|
We think for better. Powell instantly brings more heft to an administration that needs it. The standard conservative complaints about him that he favors legal abortion and racial preferences argued against making him president or vice-president, but not against his new appointment. Critics of Powell's foreign-policy views, including many conservatives, say that he is overcautious about the use of force overseas. He was a relative dove in the first Bush administration during the run-up to the Gulf War, and (like many others) he opposed continuing that war until Saddam Hussein's regime fell. Liberals and neoconservatives add that Powell's view of the national interest is too narrow, leaving little room for the promotion of American values. It's true that foreign-policy "realism" can become morally vacuous, and Powell is not immune from this tendency. (On Saturday, his paean to liberal democracy included the observation that the world "has seen that communism did not work, fascism did not work, Nazism did not work." As assaults on human dignity, they worked pretty well.) But in general, the criticism seems out of date given the way the foreign-policy debate has changed over the last decade. Liberals have become far more comfortable with the use, or at least show, of force maybe too comfortable. In these circumstances, a little caution could be a good thing.
Tom Ridge, Peacenik |
|||
|
|
|||
| If you would like to receive the Washington Bulletin via e-mail, please send a blank e-mail to WashingtonBulletin-subscribe@topica.com. In order to ensure that you are not accidentally subscribed, you will receive a confirmation message. Once you reply, you will be added to the Washington Bulletin. To unsubscribe send a blank e-mail to WashingtonBulletin-unsubscribe@topica.com. | |||
|