| 4/04/00
5:25 p.m. Uncivil Commission U.S. Commission on Civil Rights playing dirty in Florida. By NR's Ramesh Ponnuru & John J. Miller |
|
|
|
A draft of the commission's statement, obtained by NR, dismisses Bush's call to replace race-conscious undergraduate admissions with a plan that automatically enrolls the top 20 percent of every high school's graduating class in one of the state's public universities. This plan, it says, is a "public relations strategy" and "an unprovoked stealth acknowledgment and acceptance that the existing school and housing segregation will never change and that long-standing efforts to remedy the race discrimination that was legal in Florida have been abandoned." What's more, says the draft statement, Bush's proposal is "no substitute for strong race-conscious affirmative action in higher education." It even takes a swipe at Bush's school-choice law (now tied up in court): "It does nothing to ameliorate the deplorable conditions of Florida public schools and simply allows a small number of students to flee failing public schools." Typically, the commission issues statements only after an open discussion and a public vote, scheduled thirty days beforehand with an announcement published in the Federal Register. In this case, however, staff director Ruby G. Moy told the commissioners last Friday that they had until this Thursday to vote via fax or email on the Florida statement. Republican commissioners Carl A. Anderson and Russell G. Redenbaugh objected to this procedure in separate memos yesterday, asking that the commission take up the issue when it next meets, on April 14. Moy, however, turned them down, repeating a line that had appeared verbatim in her Friday announcement: "The Chair [Mary Frances Berry] believes that this statement needs to be released quickly in light of its timeliness and the fact that events are moving rapidly in this area." To make matters worse, the commission's Florida statement falls clearly outside its jurisdiction. The commissioners are supposed to investigate voting-rights violations, weigh the federal government's role in civil-rights enforcement, and offer scholarly assessments on discrimination not engage in partisan attacks on politicians they don't like. And so, this Friday, the NAACP and NOW will be able to say that the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights also thinks that Bush's "One Florida" plan is a bad idea. To accomplish this, however, the commission tossed out the very things that are supposed to give it credibility: Objective fact-finding, public discussion, and bipartisan investigation.
Off Target |