|
6/05/00
4:40 p.m. By NR's Ramesh Ponnuru & John J. Miller |
|
|
|
The law as it stands does not mark the outer limits of the abortion right that the Supreme Court has established. From time to time one hears of cases involving babies who survive attempted abortions. It is an open question if the law mandates some level of care for them, or even some protection against being killed, or if the right to abortion entails the right to a successful abortion. At least one court has ruled that state law cannot protect such a fetus, and the Supreme Court has never repudiated that ruling. That's why Hadley Arkes, a professor of jurisprudence at Amherst and a leading pro-lifer, has proposed for 12 years that a law be passed to make sure that they are protected. (Arkes originally made the proposal in NR.) And that's why Florida congressman Charles Canady has introduced the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000. Part of the point is to bring the true radicalism of current law to public attention. As it stands, even some well-informed pro-lifers underestimate the problem.
GIVE THAT MAN AN NEA GRANT In fact, it was a gorgeous Matisse-like globe floating in space, complete with the surgeon general's warning that 'cigarettes contain carbon monoxide' in the bottom-left-hand corner, over which Gore had signed his name. The next day, at the vice president's official residence, in Washington, I tell him that I was crazy about what he'd made. 'Really? Did you see it? Did you see the pyramid I glued on Egypt?' |