Put yourself in the position of Moammar Gaddafi. For years you have been enjoying doing whatever you like with the total wealth of the country, stashing it away by buying large share-holdings in Italian and German companies. Billions and billions more dollars are available in the oil reserves. Western oil companies queue up to give you this unearned wealth and the power to do mischief that goes with it. Meanwhile you have brought up your sons with the idea that they are going to succeed you, and founded a Gaddafi dynasty to enjoy this money. There is nobody and nothing that counts in the country except you and your sons. In fact it isn’t really a country at all, just a bunch of tribes that you have been careful to leave disorganized and stuck in the old ways.
You have interfered successfully abroad by supporting Irish terrorists, Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, and other African dictators — and killed Westerners by bombing planes and nightclubs. The United States has accepted blood money for American citizens you murdered. Sen. John McCain called you “an interesting man” and Tony Blair is happy to give you multiple embraces and photo-ops. The United Nations elected your Libya to the Human Rights Council.
Whatever you do, then, has never had any bad consequences for you. The tiny number of men with the capacity and will to challenge you are dead or in exile. In 1996 you had the opposition cleared away by murdering about 1,200 political prisoners in Abu Salim prison. And now suddenly, all because of a lack of dictatorial discipline in Tunisia and Egypt, a bunch of people are out in your streets, shouting against you and wanting all the wonderful things you’ve reserved for yourself and your sons. In the same position, the feeble Ben Ali in Tunis and the sick Mubarak in Cairo threw their hand in. The alternative is to fly in African mercenaries (just in case the local security forces hesitate to obey your orders) and open fire on what you think is a rabble from tribes you have always despised anyhow.
Nobody knows how many hundreds, perhaps thousands, have already been gunned down in Libya, or how many more will be. Once you have shown that you are capable of killing 1,200 men in prison, you are a committed criminal and will certainly go as deep into further crime as you think fit.
Speaking for myself now, I think that addafi is unlikely to slip out of the country like other Arab dictators. It is a case of kill or be killed. Whatever happens, the harm he has done Libya will extend. Either he reasserts himself through superior violence and punishes everyone he suspects of being behind the uprising, or he is himself somehow left for dead. In the latter case, there is no successor, no institution to assume the role of governance, and the horrors of anarchy are the sole prospect.
I am reading your "The Closed Circle". Rather then something written 20 years ago it feels like it could have been written last week. All those commentators going on and on as if the recent developments are something new with no precedent should be made to read it. The section on women was especially devastating in view of the attack on Lara Logan. If this book isn't it should be mandatory for all our diplomats and military. The power challenge scenario is playing out exactly as you described it in 1989,
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn the Arab world, things can get worse, no matter how bad they are now.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI believe that we soon will actually regret the death or exile of Gaddafi.
It's all about frying pans and fires.
The sad thing here is that we aren't faced with a choice between good guys and bad guys. Instead we are limited to picking between the bad guys and the much worse guys.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIt is hard to imagine a more irresponsible national leader than Col. Khadafy. I think a bloody Libyan revolution that includes Khadafy's death will not lead to a worse government. In fact, I predict the Libyans will start the process of political maturation because they will have so much oil money and so few people to share in the wealth that it will be practically impossible not to have a better government. There is no reason that Libya cannot have the highest standard of living for all of Africa once it dumps Col. Khadafy.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis is the flip side of war crimes tribunals and the ICC. Gentle retirement and easy living off of Swiss accounts is no longer in the cards for dictators and madmen. Even Venezuela would be crazy to take him, and if they do eventually Chavez would hand him over for a trade or arms deal with the EU. What kind of leverage does an ex-dictator have living in the good graces of other dictators?
I think it's great Milosevic died in a hole in Belgium, but we should expect this kind of slaughter will become standard for Africa (and maybe Venezuela?) in the future.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCTB,
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI am also reading "The Closed Circle". Couldn't agree with you more.
Let Libyians mete out justice to Gaddafi and his minions. I don't believe there is such a thing as international law. There are only treaties between countries, and these treaties are observed until they aren't. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a corrupt, kangaroo court, without any democratic or truly legal mandate.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs you have already pointed out David it is so sad that the British Government, under Blair and Brown, sold their soul to this man, let murderers go all so they could have Gaddafi's good graces to drill for more oil. Now look at them, sad and pathetic. Will the shame ever end? Has the law been passed yet that requires all State Department personal to read this blog? If not the House better get to it as soon as possible.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI disagreee with this article. Opposition leader Gibril Faye will take over if Gaddafi is ousted. The country will NOT slip into anarchy as neo-cons predict. According to reports, "tribal and religious leaders condemned Gaddafi for the attacks against civilians; some urged all Muslims to rise against him". This does not spell anarchy. The article also states "Local security forces appeared to have defected to the opposition, he wrote, though there were still Gaddafi loyalists operating in eastern Libya as well."
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhat is the International Court planning? Are they embarrassed to charge a leader of a nation on the Human Rights Council?
I linked Mr. Pryce-Jones's on my weblog comment.
Libya: United Nations Human Rights Council Gaddafi
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExternal Link
And once again, the Obama administration is distracted from Iran, makes a meaningless statement or two, goes on vacation, and the mullahs keep building their nuclear capabilities.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"The sad thing here is that we aren't faced with a choice between good guys and bad guys. Instead we are limited to picking between the bad guys and the much worse guys."
MarkW--This is almost always the case in politics, not even only in the Middle East
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMeanwhile you have brought up your sons with the idea that they are going to succeed you. I think the word you are looking for is SECEDE, not succeed.
SO GUYS IT'S BEEN A YEAR, that new NTC government is AWESOME right? Things are going so great in Libya now, what with the ethnic cleansing of blacks, militia violence (there are 250 separate militia groups IN MISRATA ALONE !!) There's a tribe there called the TOBU tribe, with about 40,000 members (black africans) they are being shelled from all sides. When they called NTC for help, no answer no reply. NTC is actually providing the weapons for the shelling.
Doctors without borders says it is withdrawing immediately, because all they are treating is torture victims, who often return a SECOND time after being tortured. They said they provide medical services for injuries, not to treat torture victims to be tortured once again.
The town of Tawergha, previously 30,000 residents, is abandoned and empty after rebels attacked them for being loyal to gaddafi and 'not helping misrata' - and by coincidence the majority of the residents are descendants of african slaves.
So for as bad as you think Gaddafi was, he discouraged racism, made laws to help women including banning the Abaya (like the niqab) allowing women to vote, drive, marry freely who they choose and no forced marriages, grants to help women get education, women in the military, laws that gave them rights to the home & custody of the children during divorce (sharia law excludes that) heavily discouraged polygamy,
Also here's an interesting article on the great water pipeline Gaddafi built so Libyans could have free water, spending upwards of 100million dollars, which he did not borrow from the world bank,but, paid for it himself. Called the great man made river. Of course NATO bombed it. WOW they did so much to help the civilians like that.
External Link
I always thought it was so strange that FRANCE would have been the first country to demand getting involved with Libya (being wimps and all) but turns out Libya has one of the largest water resources in the area & france owns a huge portion of the world's water rights, so that all makes sense now. CAN'T DRINK OIL.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse