Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

David Calling

The David Pryce-Jones blog.


Print   |  Text
 

More Dangerous Than Insane

Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian mass-murderer, the pundits and psychiatrists are quick to say, is insane. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London and one of the most intelligent men in public life, considers that there is nothing to study in Breivik’s mind. That seems altogether too easy a dismissal. All the evidence is that Breivik set about this crime with unusual forethought and a thoroughness which the would-be bomber in Times Square, for example, or the man with explosives in his underwear on the flight to Detroit, were quite incapable of. Breivik is an educated man, he can make good use of a phrase of John Stuart Mill’s. For a long time he has been writing a document of 1,500 pages, a testament in which he lays out that he has enemies, in this case Muslims whom he sees taking over Europe, and the social democrat politicians, all traitors, who collude in their own downfall and the end of Christian culture in the West by encouraging Muslim immigration.

Comparison with the preoccupations of Mein Kampf leaps to mind. Bolstering the Nazi analogy is Breivik’s love of dressing up in bogus uniforms complete with orders and medals. The murderous premeditated attack on the island near Oslo seems his version of the 1923 coup which landed Hitler in prison but gave him the chance to broadcast his ideology. Insane mass killers usually turn their gun on themselves but Breivik has made sure to stay alive in order to oblige people to listen to his explanations of what he has done.

Coincidentally, that same week brought unexpected news of Rudolf Hess, Hitler’s deputy. In May 1941, Hess flew to England on a mission that has never been fully explained. Captured, he was held for the rest of the war and tried at Nuremburg where he spoke and acted as though insane, much to the irritation of former colleagues in the dock with him. He spent the rest of his life in a Berlin prison. I once interviewed Frau Hess, herself an unrepentant Nazi, and she proudly showed me among other memorabilia a specially printed copy of Mein Kampf with Hitler’s dedication. Fanatics never give up.

Those executed after the Nuremburg trial were cremated and their ashes scattered. Hess was buried in a family grave at Wunsiedel, in Bavaria. Over the years neo-Nazis have treated Hess’s grave as a place of pilgrimage. Thousands of them parade there, sing their Party songs, give their Party salute, and threaten the peace. At last, the church authorities have cancelled the rights of the Hess family to their plot, and the corpse has been removed and cremated, the ashes now scattered in untraceable water.

Breivik fits into this neo-Nazi underworld now swarming in large numbers, and far more dangerous than insane. They are the mirror image of the militant Islamists busy building a society apart, and if really nobody can devise how this culture-clash should be dealt with, then Breivik may come to be a role model.

New on David Calling. . .


COMMENTS   7

EXPAND  

   07/25/11 23:35

The reason why the Nazis succeeded in Germany in the early 1930's, and the Communists succeeded in the late 1910's and early 1920's, is because these parties gave their respective peoples what the people wanted. In Germany's case, it was relief from the Great Depression and restoring societal order. In Russia's case, it was ending Russia's participation in World War I, and agrarian and economic redistribution of resources. All of the other major political actors in Germany and Russia refused to give the people what they most wanted until the Nazis and Communists took power.

The analogy to our present time is that practically every political party in the West refuses to place a halt on immigration from the Third World despite the wishes of supermajorities of their electorates. Further, the elite parts of Western culture denigrate immigration restrictionists as racists and know nothings. The economy in the West is now so depressed that people are less willing to defer to elites on this issue.

This Norwegian is a dangerous fanatic who has chosen to kill Norwegian teenagers as a way to protest Moslem immigration. This makes no sense. However, his complaints about immigration are shared by large supermajorities of his countrymen and throughout the West. The major political parties encourage third parties and extremism by making stricter immigration laws a topic that is beyond the pale to discuss.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
vince2517
   07/26/11 14:40

Good reply to a great article. Don't know if you left it out from the sake of brevity but there were many prominent people at the time who predicted that WW2 was coming when the WW1 armistice was signed. They didn't know the exact mechanics, but knew the reparations that were insisted upon by the victors would eventually lead to another conflict

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Aarradin
   07/27/11 20:19

"This Norwegian is a dangerous fanatic who has chosen to kill Norwegian teenagers as a way to protest Moslem immigration. This makes no sense."

Actually it does, but only if you're aware of the key piece of information the news agencies have all chosen to omit which explains it. He didn't attack at random, the teenagers he killed were part of a 'youth group' undergoing political indoctrination. This 'youth group' is a branch of the political party currently ruling in Norway.

You can see why the Socialist Press has decided to omit this important fact from their coverage.

Breivik was opposed to the immigration of muslims into Norway, that immigration was permitted by the socialist labour party running the country, so he blows up a bomb intended for the Prime Minister and similtaneously hunts down and kills as many of the children of the ruling party that he can, many of whom are conveniently gathered together on an island for a political retreat.

This was a calculated act of political terrorism, not the random act of a lunatic.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 11:13

The question is this: will Breivik's actions change Norway in any way? Will Norwegian police be obligated to carry weapons and do the business of law enforcement? Will Norwegians decide that their society, property and the pursuit of happiness are worth protecting? Norwegians have made a country that is other worldly, sterilized, and in many ways separated from the ugly realities of life, poverty, filth, etc., which although present in the country, are well hidden from view. Perhaps Breivik's actions heinous as they are, are simply Norway exposed. And now Norwegians can wake up and understand that they are human too and that evil exists and cannot be socialized away.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/27/11 11:52

I hope you are correct, but I am afraid they will slip back into la-la land until the next tragedy happens. Which is not a question of if but when. Either by people similar to Breivik or muslim extremists.

The tensions will not go away, but rather increase. Sad to say.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/28/11 00:06

I think a lot of people are quick to dismiss Breivik as insane because they just don't want to call evil, evil. It's easier and feels better to say he is insane, but it's certainly not true . . . not in any legal way at least. He's a murderer, a terrorist, and a megalomaniac, as well as a bunch more problems we could list. So it's easier to think of him as inhuman or insane. There are bad, evil people in this world; and he's one of them.

Same thing with people up in arms with whether or not he's Christian. What kind of Christian commits mass murder? A bad one. One that is both a bad person and a bad Christian.

There are bad, evil, dangerous people in this world. Some of them are insane, some are not, they're just bad, evil and dangerous. We can't wish them away; we have to deal with them.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/28/11 12:24

With the association so clearly linked here, I am afraid Jonah's great book is not going to be much further use.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact