1964: “It was a teenage wedding and the old folks wished ’em well / You could see that Pierre did truly love the mademoiselle.”
2012: New York Times: “Families Resigned as Young Americans Put Education, Careers on Hold.” — “The New Face of Poverty.”
1964: “And now the young monsieur and madame have rung the chapel bell.”
2012: New York Times: “Economic Downturn Brings Backlash against Working Women.” Associated Press: “Child Brides, And Not Just in Afghanistan.”
1964: “C’est la vie say the old folks.”
2012: New York Times: “Elderly Americans in Desperate Need of Additional ESL Funding.”
1964: “It goes to show you never can tell.”
2012: New York Times: “For Elderly, a Time of Uncertainty.”
1964: “They finished off an apartment with a two-room Roebuck sale.”
2012: New York Times: “With homeownership increasingly out of reach for young Americans, Pierre and his partner were forced to move into a sparsely furnished two-room rental.” — “The New Face of Poverty”
1964: “The Coolerator was jammed with TV dinners and ginger ale.”
2012: New York Times: “With food-stamp funding failing to keep up with soaring need, more young American families are resigned to a diet of cheap, frozen food and sugary soft-drinks. First lady Michelle Obama has declared her nutrition campaign ‘the moral equivalent of war.’” — “The New Face of Hunger.”
1964: “And when Pierre found work, the little money coming worked out well.”
2012: New York Times: “Young Americans, still feeling the pinch of the Bush recession, are increasingly reliant upon low-wage jobs. ‘Little money is coming,’ says one marginally employed and wretched and basically destitute young man.” — “The New Face of Unemployment.”
1964: “C’est la vie say the old folks.”
2012: New York Times: “A Generation Later, Overlooked Immigrant Community Remains Largely Unassimilated.”
1964: “It goes to show you never can tell.”
2012: New York Times: “Elderly Americans Increasingly Insecure about Prospects.”
1964: “They had a hi-fi phono, boy did they let it blast / Seven hundred little records, all blues, rock, rhythm, and jazz / But when the sun went down, the rapid tempo of the music fell.”
2012: New York Times: “Though spending on consumer goods remained strong, the savings rate remains precariously low, especially among the young.”
1964: “C’est la vie say the old folks / It goes to show you never can tell.”
2012: New York Times: “Among Elderly Non-English-Speakers, a Sense of Helplessness, Resignation.”
1964: “They bought a souped-up jitney / it was a cherry red ’53.”
2012: New York Times: “Americans Struggle to Keep Up with Car Payments.”
1964: “And drove it down to New Orleans to celebrate their anniversary.”
2012: New York Times: “With family vacations increasingly out of reach, young Americans make do with weekend road trips to nearby cities.” Associated Press: “For one young couple, the year brought a bittersweet anniversary.” — “Families Struggle in an Age of Reduced Expectations.”
1964: “It was there where Pierre was wedded to the lovely mademoiselle.”
2012: New York Times: “Gays Still Denied Marriage Rights in Much of South.”
1964: “C’est la vie say the old folks / It goes to show you never can tell.”
2012: New York Times: “For Struggling Elderly, Future of Social Security Remains Uncertain.” — “The Wrinkly Old Face of Poverty”
1964: “They had a teenage wedding and the old folks wished ’em well / You could see that Pierre did truly love the mademoiselle / And now the young monsieur and madam have rung the chapel bell / C’est la vie say the old folks, it goes to show you never can tell.”
2012: New York Times: “Rural Americans Caught in a Cycle of Poverty.” — “Poverty: The Familiar Refrain”
How innovative and sad. Innovative because I've seen anyone do socieconomic analysis using a Chuck Berry song. Sad because the Chuck Berry song is more understandable than the stuff that was written in the "truth vigilante" New York Times. Even sadder that they still blame Bush four years later.
Keep up the good work, Kevin.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseYes, how sad. How sad that the NY Times would fall into the same trap that still ensnares two-thirds of Americans, according to every poll through 2012: blaming Bush.
Good luck with your side's "Who? We don't even know that guy!" campaign strategy. Too bad the "Now we suck, but history will vindicate us!" one never caught on.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnd it puts a great song in my head to start the week. Thank you, KW.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAs a service to your readers, Kevin:
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSankyuu!!! Terrific video... :)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'll see your Frenchman and raise you a German. (Chuck is globaL)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseExternal Link
Some of my finer work.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOh, in-DEED.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSpeaking of Chuck Berry, is there any chance Mitt Romney could put Thaddeus McCotter on the ticket? Check out these licks:
External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNow if you could just piece together video clips of President Obama speeches to have him sing the song in the background (ala "Sunday" by President Bush and U2) you'd have a heck of a YouTube posting. Probably get a million hits. Intern project, perhaps?
(After all, since the President rarely speaks without his teleprompter, it shouldn't be hard to chase down where he said "mademoiselle" and "Pierre" from the written versions.)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIf you want him to do that you'll have to change the song to "My Ding-A-Ling"!
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseMakes no sense.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"First lady Michelle Obama has declared her nutrition campaign ‘the moral equivalent of war.’"
You know, Mrs. Obama, Liberal Fascism was not supposed to be a guide.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Everything you want we got it right here in the U.S.A."
Which may explain why Chuck Berry got nabbed for big time tax evasion.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseIn 1964, Pierre and the mademoiselle didn't have a lot of stuff, but they had each other. Their future was uncertain, but they were happy. Now they would be miserable and wallowing in victimhood. They would be occupying someplace, demanding the government provide them with better stuff and a more certain future. Or at least they would if they read the Times. Excellent article, Kevin.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseChuck Berry was in prison when he wrote that song for transporting a minor across state lines to do whatever. Pulp fiction?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseChuck Berry, no matter how big or small the gig, made sure to get paid cash upfront. And he does not like paying any taxes.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNo wonder people think the middle class is disappearing. If a couple doesn't have a 4-bedroom house by age 30, well then it must be that America is just one big soup-kitchen nation...our chattering and political classes have done they're level best to instill this notion, justifying an ever deeper intrusion into the affairs of their constintuents. Or should I say, wards of the state?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHaven't heard anything from Kevin since this post. Is he okay?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse