BACK TO NRO


 
   

“Mr. Bush Don't Care”
Taking lessons from Herodotus.

By Victor Davis Hanson, author most recently of Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power.
March 1, 2002 8:35 a.m.

 

n the sixth book of his Histories, the Greek historian Herodotus relates one of his many apparently silly — but, in fact, edifying — stories. An array of young suitors were vying for the daughter of Cleisthenes, the wealthy despot of the prosperous city-state of Sicyon. Potential bridegrooms from throughout the Hellenic world paraded to Cleisthenes's palace to compete for the hand of the young heiress — rival Greek aristocrats renowned for either their looks, money, strength, character, or wisdom. The haughty Cleisthenes kept them under suspenseful audit for a year, in a sort of humiliating and non-ending nitpicking examination to find the perfect — and most submissive — son-in-law.

When at last the fateful day of decision arrived, and the Athenian Hippocleides was to be announced as the lucky bridegroom-to-be, Cleisthenes offered a great feast to honor the upcoming betrothal. But as the eating and drinking waxed on through the night, the buoyant young Hippocleides ordered more and more music and dancing — to the increasing disproval of his shocked host Cleisthenes. Yet not content with the usual moves, Hippocleides at last ordered a table to be brought in. Then he jumped up on it and danced a succession of jigs in front of the startled guests and now-exasperated tyrant. Finally, the irrepressible Hippocleides in his elation stood on his head and kicked his legs widely in the air. Cleisthenes could take no more of such shamelessness, and finally barked out, "Young Cleisthenes, you have just danced yourself out of a marriage." Oblivious, the now liberated ex-suitor paid him no heed, kept up his dancing, and in his exhilaration barked back, "Hippocleides don't care."

Herodotus's story reminds me of the "antics" of the raucous and "intemperate" Mr. Bush, whose recent stern rhetoric has likewise ignored the finger shaking of his hypocritical censors. Like Hippocleides, he was supposed to mouth all the correct platitudes to media pundits, strike all the right poses in front of the dour Europeans, be properly deferential to the tyrants and autocrats of the Middle East, and hourly court self-righteous international bureaucrats. If he was going to win all their approval for "collective action," Mr. Bush was obligated to express remorse over skipping the dishonest conferences at Kyoto and Durban. He should have treated Sept. 11 as a containable criminal affair, rather than a real and unpredictable matter of war — and so indicted terrorists instead of raining bombs down on them and their hosts. But instead, the more the EU, the U.N., and other collective bodies expressed their growing disapproval of Mr. Bush's independence and high spirits — warning that he was dancing himself out of a marriage as it were — the more he has sought to kick his legs up into the air.

The president was notified not to renounce an antiquated ABM treaty signed years ago with a now nonexistent empire, to express embarrassment over his "gauche" cowboy "slips" like "Dead or alive," to agonize over "cages" in Cuba, to be more even-handed to Mr. Arafat and his terrorists, and to regret his clumsy and "unhelpful" use of the metaphor "axis." As a good suitor he was supposed to eschew words like "evil," impolite phrases such as "with us or against us," and other undiplomatic absolutes. Instead, like a former President Carter or Clinton, he should bite his lip, wrinkle his brow, sigh about the human condition, and in pained expressions and hushed tones use of our enemies at least a few weasel-words like "problematic," "challenging," "intricate," and "complex."

Unfortunately, our liberated Hippocleides told the Koreans directly that the Communists to their north are really not free, but rather dangerous peoples — and that such despots, not us, need to walk gingerly. He talked of his religion and democracy in front of millions of unfree Chinese. And, if we take him at his word, he seems to think that Afghanistan is the beginning, not the end, of this war.

In these depressing times, such self-reliance, trust in one's own culture and history, and confidence in right as one sees that right are near-criminal offenses. Indeed, an entire vocabulary has cropped up to demonize aggressive defense of just such a rare and anachronistic belief — "unilateralism," "rejectionism," "triumphalism," "insularity," "saber-rattling," "naiveté," and so on — that Western notions of freedom, personal liberty, free critique, consensual government, religious diversity, rationalism, individualism, and open markets are not only unique in history, but, in fact, the only hope for mankind and so to be protected and advanced at all costs.

History teaches that we should watch carefully these Hippocleideses, for when they finally have tired of conventional wisdom and protocol, they begin to dance to a tune that is immune from both censure and blandishment. After the great plague and the first two years of enemy invasions, the maverick Pericles lectured the restless Athenian mob that he didn't think much of their sunshine patriotism and that they could do what they pleased with him for all he cared — but he was not about to sue for peace from the Spartans. The Theban liberator Epaminondas shrugged off the admonitions of his illustrious neighbors, and instead promised the badgering Athenians that he might well march up to their hallowed Acropolis, tear down the magnificent Propylaea, and haul it back into his native Thebes. A quarter-million freed helots were the eventual dividends of his unilateralism. By mid-1864 Lincoln was told by more "seasoned" pundits that to stop the horrible carnage of summer he had either to let the Confederacy go or to allow the coexistence of slavery in a reconstructed Union. Instead, he put his faith more in Sherman taking Atlanta than in Copperheads and envoys in Washington.

It didn't seem to bother Winston Churchill that his "shrill" warnings in the late 1930s were dubbed unnecessarily confrontational and thus might unduly "provoke" Hitler, a leader whom the British establishment thought it "could do business with." Such "brinkmanship" would eventually save Britain. Truman was advised that he might well be impeached should he remove General MacArthur. But just as he dropped the bomb to save lives and drew the line against Communism in Greece and Turkey to keep millions free, he fired the vainglorious hero to preserve the idea of civilian audit — and let history worry about the consequences. The more Reagan called an evil empire an "evil empire," and prepared to confront their aggression abroad, the more he was accused of lusting for World War II — until a bankrupt and murderous Soviet state collapsed. At some point all these leaders grew tired of the harangues of the status quo, and at last decided to do what they, not their detractors and pollsters, thought was necessary to preserve the peace and advance the cause of democracy and freedom. Friends and enemies should realize that once a president has that look of Hippocleides in his eye — that he would rather follow his heart than focus groups and protocols — he runs the risk of becoming either a very great or a very embarrassed man.

Mr. Bush may also have in mind the negative lessons learned from his father's administration. Had the latter told his in-house experts that he could not really listen to coalitions, the feelings of the Europeans, and the resolutions of the U.N. when a wounded killer was still in Baghdad free to murder thousands of innocents and threaten the general peace, then he would have stayed president until 1996, and things would now be far better in the Middle East. His "moderate" and "in-the-know" advisers likewise later assured the elder Bush that he could ignore prior promises, raise taxes, and please everyone. Instead, he pleased no one and turned a potential landslide reelection into an embarrassing defeat to his moral inferior.

Playing by all the rules, listening to all the conventional wisdom, worrying about making a single false step, all that may win you the much sought after bride of world opinion as it loses your soul — and far worse for your people.

So, Mr. President, listen to Hippocleides and try to keep on dancing.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim