I was 13 years old when my mother took me, in 1970, to see The Cross and the Switchblade, an unabashedly evangelical film about New York gang leader Nicky Cruz, who converted to Christianity through the influence of Pastor David Wilkerson (played by Pat Boone). As the film’s credits rolled by, several young men walked to the front of the theater to invite viewers to talk with them about Christ.
What a long way Christian films have traveled in the four decades since. As I walked out of a pre-release screening of Machine Gun Preacher, I couldn’t help thinking that my Baptist mother would never have allowed me to see this R-rated film, because it contained all the things she abhorred: Lots of profanity, graphic violence, and sexual situations.
Machine Gun Preacher is based on Another Man’s War, an autobiography by former hard-drinking biker and drug dealer Sam Childers (played by Gerard Butler) who undergoes a spiritual transformation and finds a new calling as a protector of Sudanese children. The film opens on a nighttime scene of a peaceful, sleeping village in southern Sudan in 2003. Suddenly, soldiers from northern Sudan, the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), attack the village, killing adults and kidnapping children — and forcing one small boy to kill his own mother.
The horror fades into a scene in Pennsylvania, a few years earlier. An angry, cursing Sam Childers is being released from jail into the custody of his stripper wife, Lynn. On the way home, they pull the car over for a quickie before arriving at their trailer, where their daughter Paige and Sam’s mother are waiting.
Their lives change when Lynn becomes a Christian and gives up her stripper job in favor of work at a mushroom-packing factory. Sam eventually accepts Christ as well and is baptized at a local church, where he learns of the great need for people to travel to East Africa to help with rebuilding the villages destroyed in the civil war. Sam, a construction worker, flies to Uganda and begins working with the mission. One day he convinces local freedom fighters to take him on a bus to Sudan to see for himself what’s going on there. He is horrified at what he finds: women and children who have been butchered by LRA soldiers; others have had body parts chopped off. On a subsequent trip, Sam encounters a group of terrified children hiding from the soldiers and loads as many of them as he can onto his truck, promising the rest they’ll be picked up later. When he returns, he finds to his horror that the children have been burned to death.
Earlier in his life, Sam fought because he loved fighting. Now, he is fighting for a purpose: to save the children of Sudan from starvation, rape, murder, or being forced into becoming soldiers. He becomes a literal soldier for Christ: Enraged at the way the enemy is picking off the children at the orphanage he’s built, he gathers a truckload of freedom fighters and AK-47s and actively seeks out members of the LRA. We see a number of violent battle scenes as the two sides repeatedly clash. A young woman who works for an NGO tells Sam — who has become known as a local Rambo — that his approach is wrong and dangerous. Sam’s response: You fight the war your way, and I’ll fight it my way. Later, Sam is forced to rescue the woman when her naive approach to evil nearly gets her killed.
On his visits back home, Sam’s anger spirals out of control when he realizes how unwilling his neighbors are to donate the necessary funds to keep the orphanage running, and he explodes at his daughter — whom he has neglected in favor of helping African children — when she asks if she and her friends can hire a limo for her senior prom. It’s evident that Sam has made his passion for the children of Africa his idol; he is so consumed by their needs that he almost destroys his family.
Viewers will have some juicy moral dilemmas to discuss over their pizza afterward: What does justice look like? Does God really support what Sam does? And is it ever right for civilians to kill in order to save innocents — even in a lawless country where no government will intervene to stop the attacks? The real Sam Childers appears as the credits rolls by to answer that question: “If someone took your son or daughter, and you asked me to find them, would you question the way I would do it?” he asks.
Clearly, Machine Gun Preacher is not my mother’s Christian film. It’s not a conversion “message” film, as are the films Billy Graham’s World Wide Pictures has been making since 1953 — films which few people outside of evangelical churches have even heard of. The new kind of Christian film is partly about a growing sophistication among Christians carving out film careers after half a century of the Church rejecting everything Hollywood stands for. But it’s also about a shift within American Christiandom, says Erik Lokkesmoe, co-founder of Different Drummer, a film-marketing company that mobilizes fans and audiences. Younger people are more likely than oldsters to watch films, and they want something different: Not conversion stories, but conversation. They want films that help them recognize the world’s darkness and the brokenness of humanity. They want hints of grace, not alter calls.
“This audience is looking for honesty and storytelling, and they’re looking for characters they can identify with,” he notes. “They’re looking for films that end with no nicely wrapped-up solutions; they want ambiguity — the type of films they can have a conversation about with their friends.”
This is why, in the first 15 minutes of Machine Gun Preacher, it’s important to show the reality of Sam Childer’s pre-conversation life in all its gritty rawness. Films like this tap into stories that reflect common grace, so that when people leave the theater, “they’re haunted by something bigger than themselves,” Lokkesmoe says.
From the advent of film making, Hollywood has entertained with stories from Bible — sometimes in ways that offended real-life Christians, as in “The Sign of the Cross,” in which Claudette Colbert‘s nipples were on decadent display as she bathed in a tub of asses’ milk. While many of these films are viewed as some of the greatest ever made — think Ben Hur and The Ten Commandments – Christians are eager to tell their own stories in their own way. From Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ to Veggie Tales to Machine Gun Preacher, Christian film-makers are finding new ways to get the glorious old message out.
— Anne Morse is co-author of the upcoming book Prisoner of Conscience: One Man’s Crusade for Global Human and Religious Rights.
Of course civilians can have a right to kill in order to save innocents. If we don't have this right when there is no government, where does government draw the right to do so. People have a right to defend themselves and others. Not doing so would be in opposition to the laws of reason, God's law.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOf course civilians can have a right to kill in order to save innocents. If we don't have this right when there is no government, where does government draw the right to do so. People have a right to defend themselves and others. Not doing so would be in opposition to the laws of reason, God's law.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAlthough I'd rather not put it this way, it seems to me that most of the emphatic "Bible" Christians I see happen to be out of rehab. Twelve steps for drugs, or alcohol, or get our of prison quicker. Their behavior has not actually changed, in that they relate to their surroundings just as poorly as they did before.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseShame on the filmmaker for indulging in filth (going by your description) in the course of his message. All undoubtedly with the excuse of "reaching more people" -- AKA being cool. We no more need to watch people fornicate and listen to them curse than we need to watch them going to the bathroom on film. Great filmmakers have always been able to suggest "gritty rawness" without that. He gives Christianity a filthy name, and so he makes me sick.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm Sorry. You don't have to condone or even accept fornication and cursing, but I'm afraid the children being hacked to pieces and burnt to death can't appreciate such moral distinctions.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNo, they can't. So your point is?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI have not seen the film, but frank "rawness" is not in itself shameful - unless you want to indict the Scriptures as well. Rawness exposes and enhances shame and provides the backdrop and opportunity for remorse and the purity of Grace. Of course, if the darker material is merely puerile, that's a different thing, but I didn't get that impression from the review. Seriously, check out Jeremiah sometime.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseDear "Hardcastle"...Wow, you soooo don't get it.
1 - "going by your description " -- You haven't even seen the film.
2 - "All undoubtedly with the excuse of "reaching more people" -- AKA being cool." -- No, it's called, being honest and forthright. Sam Childers led a very dark life before his transformation and this is to show that if he can change and do something with his life, anyone can.
3 - "We no more need to watch people fornicate..." -- There's no fornication in this film. But then again, having not actually seen the movie, you wouldn't know that.
3 - "He gives Christianity a filthy name, and so he makes me sick." -- No, Christians have been able to do that all by themselves.
So called Christian films, the ones that you'd obviously enjoy, and the ones that no one other than Christians actually see (e.g. Fireproof, etc) do no more to advance the message of Christ than you do by sitting in your comfortable pew every week. Mainstream Christians seem to be quite comfortable saving the same backslid Christians over and over again without actually stepping out of their comfortable Christian "clubs" where everyone is a robot.
Non-believers will never want what Christians have if they keep showing that once you're saved, everything is all wonderful and you'll never have any problems ever again -- which is completely untrue and completely un-Biblical. Non-believers can smell dishonesty a mile away.
As the reviewer accurately stated, Machine Gun Preacher is NOT you or your mother's Christian film. It's for a new generation who wants to see something real. This film has already touched more lives than you can imagine.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm so looking forward to this film. This looks like a true story about a Christian believer trying to be faithful in a morally challenging situation and making mistakes morally and spiritually. But it also shows a Christian confronting the bloody face of history as Camus said the world needed to see.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseJust a small correction. The LRA are not from northern Sudan. They are a terrorist group from northern Uganda that raid southern Sudan. It's even mentioned in the wiki link you posted. I hope this was just a typing error and not what the film portrays. If the film thinks the LRA are a northern Sudan group then I question the director's and author's understanding of the conflict in the region.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse"Reply to comment" seems to be broken.
srhcb says, "I'm Sorry. You don't have to condone or even accept fornication and cursing, but I'm afraid the children being hacked to pieces and burnt to death can't appreciate such moral distinctions."
No, they can't. So your point is?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThat's a great way to spread the gospel. Just give people what the want. Really??? What's next? stripper poles on the platform and live nudity in church dramas. That would work if you cater to those who just want "ambiguity".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseSo much for "die to self".
"...they want ambiguity".
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAre we to cater to those who want desire moral confusion? Those who want ambiguity are looking for intellectual cover for their ethical weaknesses and moral cowardice.
The church should not cater to them but confront them.
To those criticizing this movie for its rawness...have you ever read the Bible in its entirety? Much of its content is not G-rated by any stretch of the imagination.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse“Dear ‘Hardcastle’...Wow, you soooo don't get it.”
Don’t get what?
“1 – ‘going by your description ‘ -- You haven't even seen the film.”
Yes, that is why I said, “going by your description,” which is what I am responding to.
“it's called, being honest and forthright. Sam Childers led a very dark life before his transformation and this is to show that if he can change and do something with his life, anyone can.”
My point is that many honest, forthright, and excellent films deal with dark subjects without recreating those dark subjects for imbibement.
“ no fornication in this film. But then again, having not actually seen the movie, you wouldn't know that.”
Rereading the review, I see that the sex that is depicted involves a married couple, so you are right, it isn’t fornication. My point here remains, though – there is no excuse for watching other people have sex, and there is no excuse for a Christian to show it on film. And, yes, of course I haven’t seen the movie, and I don’t intend to. I am responding to information in a review. Please don’t suppose you are making some kind of point by repeating that I haven’t seen the movie.
"’He gives Christianity a filthy name, and so he makes me sick.’ -- No, Christians have been able to do that all by themselves.” Etc.
I don’t see much of substance to respond to here. I haven’t seen the other films you mention; I have heard they are good; if they suggest that Christians have no problems following salvation, they are obviously wrong about that. I doubt that they give Christianity a filthy name, as you argue, but maybe they do. None of that in any way excuses filth in the film we are discussing.
“I have not seen the film . . . .”
LOL.
“frank ‘rawness’ is not in itself shameful - unless you want to indict the Scriptures as well. . . . Seriously, check out Jeremiah sometime.”
There is no excuse for a Christian filmmaker to contribute to the filth of the culture. Scripture does not do that. Moreover, it is perfectly possible to make a film, Christian or not, that conveys all the frank rawness you please without indulging in obscenity and filmed sex. It has been done and will be done again. This filmmaker chose not to do it.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThank you for your comments, Hardcastle! I have serious doubts that this film will bring anyone closer to Christ as well.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse