Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Home Front

Politics, culture, and American life — from the family perspective.


Print   |  Text
 

Marriage: What’s in It for Men?

A new report by Pew Research Center shows that barely half — 51 percent — of adults in the United States are married. In place of marriage are nontraditional living arrangements — including cohabitation, single-person households, and single parenthood — that may likely continue. The share of adults who are currently married could drop to below half within several years.

While the report says it’s “beyond the scope of this analysis to explain why [emphasis mine] marriage has declined,” senior writer D’Vera Cohn adds this: “I’m struck by the fact that a large percentage of people who say that marriage is obsolete still want to get married. I think they may be having two ideas in their head at once: one about the institution of marriage and what its status is in society today, which is to say that it’s a lot less dominant, central, or important in society, [and another about] their own wishes for their future, in which they personally would very much like to be married.”

Indeed they do. But some major changes have to take place first.

For starters, parents have to stop getting divorced for less than dire reasons. Many, if not most, of today’s 20- and 30-somethings are products of these divorces and thus have no role models. They may be looking for love, but they have no idea what to look for. Susan Gregory Thomas, author of In Spite of Everything, is a great example. Her parents split when she was twelve, and in an article about her book she laments the lack of guidance available to young people. “Why would we take counsel,” she asks, “from the very people who, in our view, flubbed it all up?”

Second, we must retract the message Boomers sent young women about female empowerment. Indeed, it isn’t a coincidence that marriage rates have plummeted alongside America’s fascination with the feminist movement. Empowerment for women, as defined by feminists, neither liberates women nor brings couples together. It separates them. It focuses on women as perpetual victims of the Big Bad Male. Why would any man want to get married when he’s been branded a sexist pig at “hello”? In the span of just a few decades, women have managed to demote men from respected providers and protectors to being unnecessary, irrelevant, and downright expendable. Consider these examples:

#*# Author and journalist Natalie Angier begins an article in the New York Times by writing, “Women may not find this surprising, but one of the most persistent and frustrating problems in evolutionary biology is the male. Specifically#…#why doesn’t he just go away?”

#*# In a CNN interview with Maureen Dowd about her 2005 book, Are Men Necessary? Dowd says, “Now that women don’t need men to reproduce and refinance, the question is, will we keep you around? And the answer is, ‘You know, we need you in the way we need ice cream — you’ll be more ornamental.’”

#*# Lisa Belkin, a blogger for the New York Times wrote, “We are standing at a moment in time when the role of gender is shifting seismically. At this moment an argument can be made for two separate narrative threads — the first is the retreat of men as this becomes a woman’s world.”

#*# In an article in The Atlantic titled “Are Fathers Necessary?” author Pamela Paul wrote, “The bad news for Dad is that despite common perception, there’s nothing objectively essential about his contribution.”

Women have also been raised by their feminist mothers to “never depend on a man.” As a result, couples no longer think of themselves as one unit but as separate entities sharing space. “The confusion over roles is there, as are the legacies of a self-absorbed, me-first, feminist-do-or-die, male-backlash society,” wrote Judith Wallerstein and Sandra Blakeslee in The Good Marriage: How and Why Love Lasts. Honestly, are we really surprised marriage is on the decline?

The concerns of men frequently arrive in my inbox. The latest is from Mark Trueblood, who had this to say: “From a man’s perspective, men take on an untenable risk. The culture of male disposability runs deep — some say even at the level of our DNA.” Because of this, he says, “Men are making a lifelong commitment to eschew marriage, cohabitation, and even dating in some cases. We do so for all the reasons you can guess, and more. As far as I am concerned, this is the wisest lifestyle decision for men in the United States at this point in time. And I say so as a conservative/libertarian who fully acknowledges the power of a functioning nuclear family.”

Mark Trueblood is not an anomaly. Countless men’s-rights groups have popped up across the country, and even more men happily shack up with their girlfriends with no plans to get married — which may sit well with women for a while, until their clocks begins to tick, and they become desperate for a baby. All of the sudden men look more appealing — but the men don’t want to marry them.

There may be more than one reason Americans are delaying or eschewing marriage, but almost all of them can be attributed to feminism. Feminists assured women their efforts would result in more satisfying marriages, but that has not happened. Rather, women’s search for faux equality has damaged marriage considerably (some might say irrevocably, but I’m an optimist) by eradicating the complementary nature of marriage — in which men and women work together, as equals, toward the same goal but with an appreciation for the unique qualities each gender brings to the table. Today, men and women are locked in a battle. The roles have changed too drastically, and the anger runs deep.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t call that progress.

— Suzanne Venker is co-author of the new book The Flipside of Feminism: What Conservative Women Know — and Men Can’t Say. Her website is www.suzannevenker.com.

New on The Home Front. . .


COMMENTS   43

EXPAND  

   12/19/11 10:54

“never depend on a man.”

Translation: when you find one of those rare moments when you cannot personally solve the problem ("this box is sooo heavy", "the tire thing is the that back thing", "that stupid bank made a mistake again", "what does that flashing red light on the dash mean?") never offer or promise any reward, exchange of favors, or gratitude. Just expect him to do it, and retire silently back into the woodwork.

What's really sad is that they think what they do is not only important (millions of education, social service and civil service positions like "diversity coordinator" that do not add dollar one to the GNP), but that men do nothing at which they are not equally adept - like that "combat" thing.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 10:57

You don't have to be a young child to have your life upended by parental divorce. I compare my parents' and in-laws' mid-life divorces to setting a table for a feast and, just before it is served, pulling the tablecloth out from under the banquet dishes. Every good expectation of adult life came crashing down, and every bit of "truth" and "wisdom" we thought we had learned from our parents became suspect.

For the past 15 years, my husband and I have helped teach a 12-week marriage-preparation class at our church. In the past, the engaged couples came from within the church, but in recent years, this ministry has become more an outreach, as people without any church affiliation hear of the class and enroll. I take that as a desperate hunger for reassurance that love and marriage can last life-long.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 17:45

I am curious about your marriage prep course: Do you restrict it to first timers and those who have been widowed? Or do you prepare those who have frviolously divorced their spouses and are unrepentant on that subject?

How does your church handle Luke 16:18? Does it use the current expansive reading of Matthew to nullify what Chris said regarding remarriage? If a divorced individual comes to your class, does your church leadership seek out "the other side", or is just the one individual's story of what happened good enough? Does what happened even matter?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 10:51

NOTE: THIS IS A RESPONSE TO AN ANONYMOUS POST OF 12/19 AT 17/45. I SAY THIS BECAUSE RESPONSES ARE NOT BEING POSTED AS RESPONSES ON THIS THREAD.

I would have to ask church leadership for the official word on this matter, but there is no purity test for whoever may attend the class.

If anything, I would say that going through a course like this when contemplating a second (or third) marriage after a frivolous divorce would bring about a mighty amount of conviction. About 20% of couples break their engagements or delay their weddings after attending the class.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/22/11 12:33

As "Anonymous", I look forward to hearing what your church leadership has to say, and hope that you will post it here. Ask them specifically about the passage in Luke.

Regarding the "mighty amount of conviction", are you speculating, or have you actually explored with the couples why they are breaking their engagements or delaying the wedding? What do those who are "mightily convicted" subsequently do?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 11:00

Great article! Thank you so much for raising awareness of this issue that nobody seems to want to discuss openly. Hopefully a serious conversation around these issues will lead to some change, and we may still save marriage from extinction.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 12:16

What a twit Pamela Paul sounds like. There's nothing "objectively essential" about either parent's contribution - if Mom dies, Dad will make do just the same as the other way around. But there's no reason to intentionally inflict that situation on a child due to your own selfishness.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 21:37

All of the feminists quoted in this article sound like twits, or more likely complete idiots, writing from the safety of their Manhattan apartments which are safe due to the diligence of a mostly male police force, a mostly male fire department, and a mostly male military.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 12:49

"For starters, parents have to stop getting divorced for less than dire reasons." Such as?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 13:03

I imagine part of the problem is that women now expect men to participate more heavily in child care, the dirty daily details of which are something about which men have no interest and very little tolerance to execute. What it meant for a male to form a family and procreate has completely changed in the last 30 years from what it was for eons prior, and I doubt most men find it as fulfilling a lifestyle as we did in generations past. This might also be a factor, among several, for why the marriage rate is still higher in the higher social classes. In higher social classes, the father can still hire a nanny to make sure his self-image as family patriarch isn't sullied by having to labor with daily childcare chores.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 09:45

I'm sorry for your family if the fathers in it have "no interest and very little tolerance to execute" caring for the children.

We are a traditional family, and I do most of the childrearing and homecaring while he's working to support us, and yet my husband is has enough maturity and attachment to his family to change a dirty diaper and not go running out into the street looking for a woman, any woman, to pay to change it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 09:46

Could we please get the comment threading on this section of the site fixed?! My comment was directed to nameless at 13:03.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 13:54

As long as women are "putting out" to men outside of marriage, men do not have to "put up" with women, in a lifelong commitment. Now if that's part of the feminist progress that Suzannne writes of, it is a backfire of strategic proportion. Women miss out on relationships that truly and deeply satisfy and men miss out on growing up, and on a relationship that truly and deeply satisfies. This in turn leads to more single women, and pretty soon a 51% marriage rate could be down to 40%. So much for the wisdom of man and our trying to work around the divine design. Which reminds me of, "In the year 2525, if man is still alive, if women can survive ... "

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 16:00

Over thirty years ago, a dyed-in-the-wool feminist I knew said candidly, "The sexual revolution came, and we women gained nothing from it."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 04:19

so... men have to love a woman in order to grow up?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/23/11 07:46

Your so far from reality it is saddening. All data clearly shows that women in any given locale are all sleeping with roughly the same 30-40 men.

The vast majority of guy's do not have sex or engage in sexual activities even remotely regularly.

And it pans out in the STD rates among genders. So continue your self deluded lie. It will only make women all the more undesirable. Because we have no intention of marriage. Even if the courts, law's and women's own behavior changed over night, you can't undo all the female chauvinism, bigotry and hatred we have suffered from. How can you give a 20 something guy who was discriminated against in school his future back?

Or what about all those boy's and young men driven to suicide over being raped by older women(or falsely accused of rape)? Can you give their lives back to them? Can you?

Women on both the right and the left have been projecting nothing but hatred towards men, young men and boy's for over 40 years. The sheer level of cognitive dissonance you galls and your mangina's/white knights exhibit over these issues is beyond believable.

Us guy's(especially gen Y guy's) have been jumping up and down for half a decade saying what is wrong.

Saying that we are being discriminated against, that we run into rampant hatred and bigotry in our day to day lives; and you still only care about yourself and your all girls club.

Truly sickening.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 15:38

"For starters, parents have to stop getting divorced for less than dire reasons." Such as?

Such as "irreconcilable differences". What total rubbish that is. Translated, that means "I'm just tired and bored with you and don't feel like working at this any more". It's for the weakest of the weak, and one of the most self-centered acts known to the world. Pathetic people, basically. The advent of the so-called "no fault" divorce was the single most devastating thing to happen to the American family. It's corrosive effects will be felt for generations, unfortunately.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 17:14

What's in it for men? Nothing. Women want to be provided for, catered to, and have children. Men are used as a meal ticket, entertainment foil, and for their sperm. When there is a wide and deep chasm between the reality of marriage and its theory...well, reality will win everytime. Fix it? Change it? Unlikely. Society and culture have changed.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 21:43

I wonder if any of these feminist types had a father. Mine left when I was two and I can tell you that I really needed him almost constantly.. When I got married my husband had to spend the first twenty years of my marriage patiently ignoring my expectation that he would leave every time we had a disagreement. I did grow up to be fiercely independent, but if I'd had a father I would have also been confident. My kids have had two parents, a Dad and a Mom. I made sure of it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/19/11 21:57

A good article would be marriage: what's in it for children. Until the boomers reached adolescence ours was a society aimed at protecting and providing for children, the elderly and the vulnerable. There are still a lot of good, decent people in this country who work hard to care for their marriages and families. Divorce and single parenthood injures children.

If men want good wives it wouldn't hurt to join a serious church. Having the same faith and goals helps keep a marriage solid. Avoid women with an agenda. Whether it's environmentalism, feminism, animal rights or any other excuse to be ardent and obnoxious a man will end up being dragged along for the ride on a capricious roller coaster. Don't sleep with women you aren't married to. They may easily have venereal diseases. It says a lot that's bad about women if they sleep around. If they get pregnant you can't do anything to stop them from killing your kid at a clinic. If men set the bar high in terms of what they expect from a worthwhile woman the feminists will look like the fools they are, and women who are serious about wanting marriage and a family will work to make that possible.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.




* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact