HELP
Author Archive
E-mail Author
Send to a Friend
<% dim printurl printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version

October 2, 2002 10:15 a.m.
Grace Mugabe’s shopping, Barry Manilow’s loyalties, George W. Bush’s family, &c.

he New York Post’s saucy, delicious “gossipeuse,” as they call her — Cindy Adams — had a curious item yesterday. Listen: Robert Mugabe’s wife, Grace, “must harbor a fondness for Britain, seeing as how she behaves like a queen. A recent shopping day the whole Harrod’s store closed for Grace. [That’s how Cindy talks — and writes. Can you imagine writing like you talk?] Doesn’t even do that for Elizabeth [meaning, the Queen].”

Now, I have no idea whether this item is true (sorry, Cindy), but if so, it’s breathtaking. You know that the Mugabe regime is engaged in a kind of “ethnic cleansing,” terrorizing white farmers and throwing them out of their houses and off their land. This same Mrs. Mugabe actually went and picked out one of the choicer farms for herself — she went to visit, to inspect, while the couple who own and built the place — elderly, traumatized — were still there.



  

This reminded me of something my friend David Pryce-Jones wrote in his (superb) biography of Unity Mitford, the great British Nazi. Her friend Hitler “gave” her the apartment of a Jewish couple. Mitford and a Nazi escort went to check it out, and as Unity was pondering new curtains and so on, the Jewish couple sat on the couch, quietly weeping. Mitford was utterly oblivious.

No one was ever more misnamed than “Grace” Mugabe. She should be arrested, rather than left free to shop unbothered by the sight and sounds of others at Harrod’s.

From one New York Post gossipeuse to another. Liz Smith reported that, along with Barbra Streisand, Barry Manilow performed at that big Democratic fundraiser the other day. Did you know that? Barry, oh, Barry, how could you do this to us! He’s apparently a big left-winger. I would have pegged him, for sure, as a Republican, or a Republican-leaner, even if closeted. He has endured so much ridicule from all the sophisticati over the years. I thought for sure that would have driven him into our camp. But no. He’s hanging out with, and crooning for, the cool people.

I’ve defended Barry Manilow for ages, on both musical and cultural/social grounds. Ah, the heartache!

Speaking of Liz Smith: I’ll tell you how strange a town New York is. Yesterday, in the space of about 30 seconds, I saw both the composer John Harbison (talking on a cell phone) and Ann Richards, the ex-governor of Texas, within three blocks of my house. (“House.” I, the Midwesterner, can’t stop saying “house” — of course, it’s not a house, but a small apartment.) When you see Richards, you think: “Never was a woman more impressed with herself.” I don’t know if she was born with a silver foot in her mouth, but she was born with an ego the size of Texas — or Manhattan. Maybe that’s why she had to move here.

(Oh, just so you know: Richards is a great pal of Liz Smith. Hence my “transition,” above.)

(One more aside: Liz is a great supporter and booster of National Review. So bless her Democratic, Texas/Manhattan heart, a thousand times over.)

Just the other day, President Bush “slipped up” and said, while indicting Saddam Hussein, “and he’s also the one who tried to kill my dad.” That tore it: Everyone said, “You see, it’s purely personal! Why go to war — sacrifice American sons — just so this little twerp — ‘Shrub,’ Ann Richards and all the other smart ones call him — can settle a family feud?!”

This reminded me of something else: Recently, I was talking to some people who said, “Wouldn’t you know, of all the states in the Union, it had to be Florida, where Bush’s brother is governor, where the 2000 presidential campaign was won. Gee, what a coincidence!”

Yes, actually: What a coincidence. When it came down to Florida, on Election Night 2000 — and for weeks thereafter — a lot of us cringed, because it looked so bad: The drama was occurring in the state of which W.’s brother happened to be governor. It could have happened in any other state — but now it appeared that these two brothers, scions of an important political family, were in cahoots. This was a PR blow for the Republicans. From their (our) point of view, it might have been better to play this out in any other state: Jeb had to remain super-squeaky-clean, had to recuse and recuse, so as to avoid “even the appearance of impropriety” (no such luck).

Sometimes life is like that — odd things happen. And “life” has given us a president, after 9/11, whose father was president two presidents ago. In his U.N. speech, speaking of the attempt by Saddam Hussein on the life of Bush 41, in Kuwait City, GWB said “a former president of the United States.” But that gets awkward to say over and over: “a former president of the United States” (awkward for that president’s son, that is). So, the other day, W. did indeed “slip up” and say “my dad.”

You recall that, when James L. Buckley was in the U.S. Senate, Bill Buckley — instead of saying “my brother” or using some stiff locution — wrote “the sainted junior senator from New York.” That was a neat way — sly, acknowledging, knowing — around a ticklish problem.

When drawing up a bill of particulars against the Iraqi dictator, we may well include his attempt on GHWB. Obviously, President Clinton thought it important: He retaliated (although half-heartedly, as usual, when it came to Iraq and terror generally). It may be awkward that the target of this assassination effort was the father of the current president — but, as in Florida, tough luck. It still counts.

Get Impromptus In Your Inbox!

If you would like personal Web delivery of Jay Nordlinger's Impromptus, enter your e-mail address here:  

In his masterpiece Bonfire of the Vanities, Tom Wolfe wrote of the search for the Great White Defendant — the guy in the dock who was white, and preferably well-off, instead of black and poor. In the same way, some have searched for the Great Black Moderate in politics. And they have embraced Ron Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas who is now the Democratic nominee for Senate. He seems like such a jovial, measured, admirable type. And here he goes:

He “roused San Antonio veterans by saying Wall Street financiers and Washington budget-busters don’t ‘look like us,’ while soldiers do.” This according to a report from Texas. Disgusting, and societally lethal, this racial poison. I hope Kirk’s opponent crushes him by 3 million votes. He isn’t fit to hold office, to talk like that — even to think like that. Radicals like Sharpton say, “Oh, you just want some patsy, some Tom.” No, actually: but a minimal decency wouldn’t be bad.

Care for some good news, after that? Herschel Walker, the great former running back (or is that “former great running back”?), has endorsed and is stumping for Saxby Chambliss, the Republican nominee for Senate in Georgia. We all know that Walker, being black, isn’t supposed to do that: Color is supposed to determine his politics. Must be something wrong with him. A deep psychological problem, or a sickness of the soul. If you don’t believe so, just ask Jesse Jackson, or your kid’s poli-sci professor.

Isn’t Madeleine Albright a helpful gal? In testimony before the Senate, she quoted Dean Acheson, who said that it was sometimes necessary to “overdramatize a threat in order to arouse public support” (for military action, for example). Continued Albright, “This administration is now doing just that by trying to claim Sept. 11 as a primary reason to go to war against Iraq.”

First, there can’t be “a primary reason,” but only one primary reason. But remember: Everything did not change after 9/11. Never has a cliché been rendered untrue so fast. If mass carnage isn’t reason to get serious about terrorists and their state supporters, I don’t know what is. Albright et al. can just sleep on, and testify on — while the present administration makes the world safer for them, their children, and their grandchildren. Pardon the campaign-style rhetoric, but it’s true.

I’m not a great basher of the FBI, U.S. attorneys, and other such officials, but can you believe that federal prosecutors “mistakenly turned over 48 classified FBI reports to Zacarias Moussaoui [the “20th hijacker”] in what a federal judge described as a grave security breach,” as the New York Times reported? Head-shaking. This is Three Stooges stuff.

I was amused and amazed to read that Nawaf al-Hazmi, one of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers, “lived so openly in the United States before the attacks that he called the police when he was the victim of an attempted robbery in Fairfax, Va., on May 1, 2001” (again, the Times). Ponder that for a moment. It’s no consolation to the dead — or rather, to their survivors — but: What a country. What a country, in which a terrorist like Hazmi would feel free to do that — and what a contrast with the countries from which they hail.

Polls are showing that Americans are increasingly skeptical that the Bush administration has legitimate reasons for warring against Iraq. This could be the result of the media wave (which is staunchly and consistently anti-Bush and anti-war) — that is, the coverage (or, better, commentary) could be self-fulfilling. People hear constantly, “Bush has no case” or “has not yet made the case,” and they repeat to pollsters, “Well, no.”

I’m reminded of something that Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa said during the mid-1980s. I loved him for it. He said, “If I relied on the media for my information, I’d oppose aid to the Contras too.”

Perfect.

Three quick points on Sen. Torricelli: 1) He was like Andrew Cuomo, who dropped out of the race rather than face the music — which is to say, face the voters. (Young Cuomo quit the New York Democratic gubernatorial primary when the opinion polls had him losing to Carl McCall.) That’s a new and rather cowardly thing to do: quit, so that you don’t have to say, in the future, that you “lost.” If you’re in, let the voters have a chance to judge. And you never know, for certain, what will happen. And surely Torricelli didn’t drop out for “higher” reasons: the sake of the party, the sake of the Democratic agenda, etc. Has the senator ever shown that in his character?

2) I’m surprised that the Democrats weren’t baying for him to leave. As I’ve said many times — particularly during the Lewinsky affair — if a leader of my party proved a skunk, I would be the loudest demanding that he go. I would be banging on the gates. Because that person’s continuation in office would taint me, too, in a way. This is a major difference between the two parties: Recall how the Democrats circled the wagons around Clinton, during impeachment. And consider that no one said about Torricelli, “He’s a skunk, he’s corrupt, we should be free of him.” And do you remember when Bob Livingston resigned, before he could officially become Speaker?

I know that there’s no difference between the two parties, morally — at least that’s what we’re told. Politics is a dirty business, and no party is more virtuous than another. I know this is the line. But . . . may I confess to you? I wonder.

And 3) We called him “the Torch,” but his name wasn’t pronounced in the Italian fashion. As I was able to confirm as a reporter, years ago, Torricelli himself says “Torriselli.” But people just like that idea of “the Torch.”

Let’s have a little mail. A reader, several Impromptuses ago, said that the friendliest people in the world were Australians and West Texans. (You recall our little running debate.) Now, another reader contributes something about West Texas: “A good friend of mine from Fort Stockton likes to tell the story about the local Sunday talk show he was watching one weekend. There was apparently a panel of Texan politicians discussing the nature of the good people of the state, and someone from North Texas alleged that the folks in West Texas ‘had no culture.’ To which the mayor of Fort Stockton replied, ‘No sir, you’re absolutely wrong about that. When it comes to culture, we West Texans are the first hogs to the trough!’

“You have to love West Texans.”

You do indeed.

And how about this? “In the ’60s during summer breaks from college I drove a cab in Boston. One evening I picked up a young lady with a British-like accent, who I learned was from Australia. During the course of about ten minutes of small talk, I said that I hoped to visit Australia someday. As I was collecting her fare at the end of the ride she handed me a note. On it were her parents’ names, address, and phone number. She insisted that if I visited Australia I had to visit them, and that they would be happy to have me stay with them. This, after an acquaintance of only ten minutes. Amazing! I’ve not made it to Australia yet, but I’ve never forgotten that gesture.”

I know many, many similar stories, about the Aussies.

Finally, I spotted this, and thought it cute: “Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you are a mile away and have their shoes.”

You want to criticize the grammar in that sentence? Ah, then you really can’t hear the beautiful music of the thing.

Misunderestimated

Bill Sammon paints a riveting portrait of President Bush as he broadens the war on terror overseas.

Buy it through NR

 
Looking
for a story?
Click here