HELP
Author Archive
E-mail Author
Send to a Friend
<% dim printurl printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version

Decermber 2, 2002, 8:35 a.m.
A funny face, “social rest,” a king’s ransom, and more.

are to begin with a little name-dropping? I thought so. On the plane home from Michigan today (I’m writing on Sunday), I sat across from Jeff Daniels, the actor. He’s a Michigander. Has a playhouse in Chelsea (I’m talking about a theater, not the Pee Wee kind — and, when I say “Chelsea,” I’m not talking about a neighborhood in Manhattan, but a little town in Michigan, close to Ann Arbor). Back when I worked at golf courses, Daniels was a customer — his engagement with that sport speaks well of him.



  

Anyway, I just want to state that he has a funny face — and I mean no disrespect when I say this. It’s a handsome face. But it’s a funny face, too, with a degree of rubberiness, à la Dick Van Dyke. It composes itself in funny formations. In sum, it’s a great mug for an actor, allowing, I would think, for a broad range of parts and moments.

For many years, I’ve been complaining about the abolition of “Christmas” — I mean, the word. At some point, everyone seemed to get terrified of saying “Christmas.” It was “holiday” this and “holiday” that. “Happy Holidays,” “Happy Holidays,” “Happy Holidays,” until you wanted to shoot yourself. The “Christmas party” was dead; it was the “holiday party.”

For the first time, over this past long weekend, I heard “holiday” — repeatedly — for Thanksgiving. Are Americans now afraid to say “Thanksgiving” too? I mean, who can be offended? The stewardess (there’s another “offensive” word) said over the PA, “Have a wonderful holiday.” A girl (there’s another “offensive” word) said in the shopping mall on Friday, “Did you have a good holiday?”

I mean, it’s epidemic (or “endemic” or something — I’m too lazy to re-look those things up).

Let me add a little footnote: Years ago, I had a wonderful boss of the Hebraic faith (as Gore Vidal would say) — I won’t name him, but his name rhymes with Kill Bristol — who happily, pointedly, said “Christmas party,” rejecting the anodyne, needlessly-touchy “holiday party,” which said something (warm) about him.

I know you’re sick of this subject (many of you), but I must say something about Tiger Woods. I mean, he simply doesn’t live in the realm of the human. Last week, he participated in the two-round Grand Slam of Golf, which featured four of the top players in the world (including Woods). Now, when four of the world’s best get together for a mere 36 holes, the winner should win by only a shot — maybe two — and it’s likely that there will be a playoff.

Woods won this event by 14 strokes. I’m not sure how to convey to the non-golfer how freakish that is — how simply impossible. Over 36 holes, he beat — count ’em — Davis Love, Justin Leonard, and Rich Beem by 14 strokes (shooting 61 in the second round).

As I said, this isn’t human. Just suck it up and be in awe.

Another footnote: As I mentioned in the first piece I wrote for NR about Woods, I once heard Ken Venturi, commentating in the booth for CBS, say of a player who, on Sunday, was leading a regular, four-round tournament by three strokes: “He’s lapping the field.” And he was right.

A couple of words about Israel: How the nation can continue to live with this is almost inconceivable. How the government can avoid major action against Israel’s enemies is similarly inconceivable. It’s simply open season: and the government must respond.

That attack on the Israeli polling place? I’m not much for symbolism, when the world provides all too much reality, but there is something to be noted there: Certainly no Arab can vote in a free election (unless, of course, he’s an Israeli). And that area of Israel is heavy with Moroccan Jews — people who had immigrated in part to escape such hate and violence.

Finally, Thomas L. Friedman, the most influential columnist in the world (you could argue, as I have), wrote on Nov. 27, “Soldiers shooting kids is wrong. Suicide killing is wrong. There is no God that blesses either.” (The entire column is found here.) By “soldiers,” he meant Israeli ones. These are servicemen going after terrorists who are blowing up kids and others deliberately; they sometimes, and tragically, hit kids when they are in such hot pursuit.

Obviously.

Folks, Thomas L. Friedman has won three Pulitzer prizes.

I’ll stop now.

Hang on, one more point: As you know, Israelis have long said that just about the worst thing the terrorists, continual warmakers, and no-compromisers have done is create the conditions in which such accidental killings are possible, even inevitable. Damn them (of course).

Referring to anti-war demonstrations on campus, Sen. Hillary Clinton said, “It’s great to see all of this energy. For a long time, people said our college campuses were dead, but they’re not. We have people willing to share their opinions.”

My question: Why can’t colleges be places of learning instead of political agitation? I mean, do students know enough to agitate one way or the other? During the allegedly apathetic ’80s and ’90s, Abbie Hoffman liked to denounce campuses as “hotbeds of social rest” — pretty cute, huh? But what’s wrong with a little social rest, while learning is taking place?

There is pressure on students to be political activists; the idea of the university is perverted.

But you know all this, I know.

A thought occurred to me as I read of the new permission of pilots to carry arms. Many years ago, the pro-gun (pro-Second Amendment) people had a bumper sticker that said, “Fear the government that fears your guns.” (You’re supposed to shiver now.) Well, should we trust men and women to pilot our planes who cannot be trusted with firearms?

Just a thought — simple-minded, I know.

And, by the way, I heard the wife of a fighter pilot say something interesting recently. She said, “Everyone says that Bush walks like a cowboy, or tries to; no, he walks like a fighter pilot — it’s obvious.”

Wasn’t to me, but I mostly believe it.

Regular readers know that I don’t have much use for Joe Lieberman — as witness a post-2000-election piece on him (not available on the web, apparently) — but I have to give him credit for a nice line: Asking Tom Ridge to take over homeland security is “like asking Noah to build the ark after the rain has started to fall.” Yes, and well said.

Ridge himself said, “We have to be right a thousand times a day forever. They have to be right once in a while” (he was referring, of course, to our terrorist enemies). This is very close to the longstanding terrorist’s phrase: “You have to be lucky all the time; we have to be lucky only once.” No excuse not to gird up, however.

I was happy to see that Lisa Myers is taking over a new investigative-reporting unit at NBC. At the risk of spoiling her reputation: She was one of the better, more honest reporters working during the Lewinsky-impeachment affair.

In a New York Times article about the municipal problems in Gotham — a big deficit, the difficulty of budget cuts, etc. — I was struck by the following sentences: “Fat in the government is not like fat on a chicken; it’s like fat in a steak. It’s marbled through.” This profundity — and I’m not being sarcastic — was uttered by Don Mele, identified as “a vice president for government affairs at the New York City Partnership and Chamber of Commerce, a business organization.” I leave it to the reader to ponder the implications.

Conservative journalists have a subspecialty: criticizing the obituaries of Communists in the New York Times. I could subject you to a long harangue: or simply point you to two — here and here — such obits that appeared on the same day. Aren’t they cute and cuddly, those liberals-in-a-hurry?

On the subject of Communists — and lionized ones: Edward Rothstein had a (typically) superb article that included this beauty from Lynne Stewart (the Red and jihad-supporting and -furthering lawyer): “I don’t have any problem with Mao or Stalin or the Vietnamese leaders or certainly Fidel locking up people they see as dangerous.”

Three cheers for King Constantine — or at least for common sense and justice. This Greek “king” (pardon the quotation marks, but you know . . .) is one of those monarchs exiled from their home countries and forbidden to reenter. He just won a case in the European Court of Human Rights that requires the Greek government to compensate him for the property stolen from him in 1967, after the military coup. Now, if only the Greeks will let him back into the country — say, for the 2004 Olympics. What do they have to fear? Democracy will crumble if this ex-monarch does a little sightseeing and visiting of old friends? Is the government in Athens so insecure as that? Is democracy so fragile in the land of its birth? Let’s get real, y’all.

Return with me now to those thrilling days of 1984, when Sen. George McGovern was running, again, for the Democratic nomination for president. One day, he was addressing NOW — the National Organization for Women — and, after he said how delighted he was to be there, the audience started to boo and hiss. McGovern looked up, startled. Then a group leader on the dais leaned over to him and said, “They want you to say ‘National Organization for Women.’” The ex-senator had said, “National Organization of Women.”

I thought of this when Jay Leno, on The Tonight Show, made this mistake recently: “of” instead of “for.” And I remember thinking at the time — in that meaningful year of 1984 — what a grossly dogmatic organization NOW must be, to boo and hiss an old left-liberal warrior on account of something so trivial and forgivable as that. Maybe I’m “over-reading” the situation, but it struck me as telling.

Guys, I said in my last Impromptus that there would be no more Great First Lines, but readers inundated me anyway — so I will consent to one last round (to be published soon). But that’s it (I’m pretty sure)!

And, did you have a nice holiday?

Misunderestimated

Bill Sammon paints a riveting portrait of President Bush as he broadens the war on terror overseas.

Buy it through NR

 
Looking
for a story?
Click here