A Monument to PC
No one would have thought to call them “white firefighters” until just a few days ago. Prior to that, they were just “firefighters,” or “heroes,” or “the bravest.”

January 14, 2002 2:30 p.m.

 

n Stalinist Russia, they used to airbrush out officials once they became politically inconvenient. Something similar is now happening to the famous Sept. 11 photo of three white firefighters hoisting the flag at Ground Zero.

Of course, no one would have thought to call them "white firefighters" until just a few days ago. Prior to that, they were just "firefighters," or "heroes," or "the bravest."

But last week it became clear that the city wanted a statue commemorating the event to include a black and Hispanic firefighter along with one (acceptable) white one.

Now, as a matter of bean counting this is just wrong — less than 3 percent of firefighters are black, and less than 4 percent are Hispanic.

As matter of art, it seems dubious. As Jonah Goldberg asks, how actually do you depict a Hispanic firefighter in a bronze statue?

And as an exercise in plain truthfulness, it seems an outrage. Why take something that was real, true, and unstaged, and make it something false, contrived, and political?

There must be plenty of ways to honor those black and Hispanic firefighters who fell on Sept. 11. But doing it by quota-mongering one of the most stunning and well-known images of Sept. 11 is a mistake.

Everyone who knows the famous picture and sees the new statue will now think about race. It will become a monument to political correctness, rather than to duty and sacrifice, the two virtues to which all firefighters on Sept. 11 gave their lives.

The statue controversy is another indication that "diversity" isn't what it's cracked up to be. In fact, the mantra of diversity is a bit of a ruse.

As John Fonte of the Hudson Institute and James Caesar of the University of Virginia have pointed out, the Left isn't "multicultural" so much as "bi-cultural": it divides the world into victims and victimizers, and systematically tries to favor the former and punish the latter.

So, when three representative men from a department of government that happens to be overwhelmingly dominated by white ethnics (Irish and Italians) are involved in a celebrated act, it isn't enough to marvel at it and extol it as an example of New York City's great diversity.

Irish and Italians, after all, are an increasingly small slice of New York City (all white non-Hispanics are 35% of the city's population).

No, the image has to be changed, because Irish and Italians are considered members of the victimizing group and as such are symbols of oppression in the struggle for racial power that the Left imagines carries on without end.

This poisonous line of thought should be left for seminar rooms in Ann Arbor and the upper echelon of the New York Times, and shouldn't be allowed to ruin that image from Sept. 11.

Please, just leave it alone.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim