Is Ted Postol MAD?
He can’t distinguish between reality and his feverish fantasies.

May 10, 2001 4:40 p.m.

 

here's Nightline when you need it?

MIT professor Ted Postol is one of the media's favorite
E-mail Rich

Printer-Friendly

E-mail a Friend

Lowry Archive

commentators on missile defense, because — surprise, surprise — he doesn't think it will work. Postol's theory is that decoys launched with incoming warheads will inevitably overwhelm any defensive system.

Postol believes that the military knows this, but is just ignoring it — in fact, that it is covering it up.

Postol alleged that defense contractor TRW and the Pentagon manipulated the results of a June 1997 test to claim it was a success, when really the interceptor couldn't distinguish between the decoy and a warhead (because, according to Postol, no interceptor will ever, in the history of man, be able to distinguish between the two).

Postol accused TRW and the Pentagon of a "fraud and cover-up," and the charges were reliably picked up by the New York Times and most other mainstream media outlets.

Well, now the FBI has looked into, and dismissed, Postol's allegations of criminal wrongdoing. Postol's response? To allege an FBI cover-up.

"I am amazed the FBI would have done this without checking with the [General Accounting Office, which is also conducting a review]," Postol said. "It looks to me that the FBI was simply not interested in doing anything except covering it's back."

Quick, someone call Nightline — Ted Postol can't distinguish between reality and his feverish fantasies!

Decoys, of course, are a real issue for a defensive system. But it isn't necessarily a simple matter — especially for a rogue state — to pack decoys into an ICBM. They would add weight, and therefore would diminish range and accuracy.

And there's no reason to believe as a theological matter — as Postol does — that a defense will never be able to identify decoys. Surely, defensive technology and decoy tactics will both get increasingly sophisticated, in the game of nip-and-tuck that has characterized the race between defensive and offensive weapons throughout human history.

So, Postol's argument doesn't make missile defense a "fraud," but this latest episode should be a solid step toward establishing him as one.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim