Media Blog

NRO’s MSM watchdog.

Time Defends Fox News


The latest phony Media Matters–controversy involves a Fox News memo that tells anchors to refrain from using the phrase “public option” when discussing Obamacare. Time points out why Media Matter, Howard Kurtz, and other Fox-bashers are wrong in their critique. An excerpt:

Here’s what Kurtz and Media Matters fail to note: Most Americans did not understand what the “public option” was. The term, in fact, seemed almost intentionally non-descriptive. Scores of journalists asked me during the health care debate to explain to them what the public option was – and these were folks interested in the news and paying attention to the issue.

The public option would have been a government-run insurance plan some Americans could have purchased. It would have been supported by premiums with no government subsidization and would be been purely voluntary. Like Medicare, the reimbursements paid by the public option would have been set by the government. Also like Medicare, the plan would not have needed to turn a profit, making it cost less than private insurance. It would have therefore provided tough competition for private insurers and pushed down premiums throughout the marketplace.

The whole post here.


Subscribe to National Review