Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Media Blog

NRO’s MSM watchdog.


Print   |  Text
 

SOPA: The Battle in Congress over Internet Censorship

It appears that the “Stop Online Piracy Act” (SOPA) may not have the votes to pass in Congress. There seems to be growing, bipartisan opposition to the bill. Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) said that, “I don’t believe this bill has any chance on the House floor. I think it’s way too extreme, it infringes on too many areas that our leadership will know is simply too dangerous to do in its current form.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi tweeted that, “Need to find a better solution than #SOPA #DontBreakTheInternet.”

Unfortunately, the sponsors of the bill, Rep. Lamar Smith (R. ,Texas) and Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.) are not backing down from their positions. They have redoubled their efforts in recent days, even claiming that SOPA will help protect American soldiers:

Trafficking in counterfeit military goods — H.R. 3261 creates a strong deterrent to those who knowingly risk the lives of members of our armed forces and law enforcement by significantly increasing criminal penalties on those who knowingly traffic in counterfeit military goods or goods sold to law enforcement.

I would imagine that there are other laws on the books that would serve as a better deterrent to the trafficking in counterfeit military goods than this bill. Here is a list of the other reasons why Congressmen Smith and Conyers think their bill should pass. Also, in case you were wondering, here is the actual bill itself. Let’s hope it is stopped.

New on Media Blog. . .


COMMENTS   2

EXPAND  

Michael K
   11/18/11 14:54

Isn't Rep Smith embarassed to be listed as a co-sponsor of a bill with John Conyers?? Wonder how much Hollywood had to be Smith to bend over for them. You a know a bill stinks when the supporters go the "It's for the Children" or "It's for Soldiers" argument.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/18/11 15:23

This is a classic example of "how a bill becomes a law" ca 2011. You should invite Jack Abramoff to do an op ed on this. Pure special interest pleading and influence and truly shameful that the House, which purports to be the home of the modern "tea party" ethic, burns up precious political capitol on such foul legislation. And can we add a 12th commandment for Republicans; to wit: he who consorts with John Conyers shall be banished to the outer reaches of the solar system, never to legislate again. This Congress should be moving in the opposite direction. What happened to rolling back the FCC's utterly fraudulent assertion of authority to regulate the internet? What a mess . . .

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact