With all due respect to Eric Bolling of Fox News and Dan Gainor of the Media Research Center, you two are way off base saying the new Muppet movie is trying to “brainwash” America’s children. Here’s the clip:
I’m really not sure that either of the two watched the movie. To recap (spoilers ahead) a rich guy buys the old, rundown Muppet studio to get to the oil underneath the studio. The Muppets have a deadline to raise $10,000,000 to save the studio, but the only person who seems to really care about saving it is the non-Muppet Gary, played by Jason Segal, who then goes on a quest to get the Muppet gang back together for a television fundraiser.
Now, here’s where Bolling and Gainor go off-base when they talk about the movie’s anti-capitalist undertone. Gary finds Kermit at a Beverly Hills mansion surrounded by an electric fence, Gonzo is the CEO of a successful manufacturing company and Miss Piggy is a wealthy fashion designer in Paris. Is that anti-capitalist?
If anything, the movie’s main target is Hollywood itself as the Muppets are unsuccessful pitching their fundraising special to all of the networks — including Univision. They only get a shot when a network executive finds out the teachers’ union is demanding the network pull its successful reality show, “Punch Teacher” off the air and she now has dead-air to fill.
The actual message is that Hollywood has abandoned programing like the Muppets in favor of idiotic reality TV. Um, conservatives don’t agree with that message now?
The movie ends when Gonzo knocks out the rich oilman with a bowling ball that seems to induce a change of heart as the evil dude now loves the Muppets and the studio is saved.
I asked my kids about the movie — 9 and 5 — what they thought, you know, to see the extent of the brainwashing.
My 9-year-old was impressed with the evil character’s perseverance as he ultimately won in the end, except for the bowling ball to the head. I then asked him do you a) think better of big companies after watching the movie, b) think worse of big companies or c) you have no idea what I mean. He answered “c.”
My 5-year-old really liked “Sherman” the Frog and “Fuzzy” Bear’s “toot” shoes. Both kids thought Animal — in treatment for anger management — was the best character. I hate to say it, but I’m with Media Mutters on this one: no brainwashing in evidence.
If one were to criticize the new Muppets, however, the “toot” shoes are a good place to start. From an Examiner.com review:
I remember reading some months back Frank Oz saying the reason he did not become involved with “The Muppets” (Eric Jacobson provides the voice for Miss Piggy) was because he did not approve of the script that Jason Segel and Nicholas Stoller wrote. One example Frank Oz gave was the fart shoes Fozzy Bear wears at one point and he pointed out how the Muppets would never have to use that kind of humor to get a laugh. When I saw “The Muppets” I completely saw what Frank Oz was talking about. These were not the Muppets I grew up with and nowhere near as good as the original movies.
As for my children getting brainwashed by fart jokes, um, I might have had a hand in that long before they discovered the Muppets.
Great analysis on the silliness that sometimes infects those both on the left and right. The "Occupy Hollywood" crowd is no different than the "Occupy Wall Street" bunch, other than their bathing rituals, of course. To the OWS crowd, I say earn a degree that will allow you to be marketable and become part of the 1% (which would actually increase it, I suppose). To the OH bunch, I'd recommend attending a film school and make a movie that is more aligned with your own ideology (which would help balance the liberal scale of Hollywood, of course).
Manufacturing: One industry that Leftists have fond memories
Fashion Designer: Definitely dominated by Leftists
Evil, rich oil magnate: Definitely a belief by Leftists
No, the movie may *not* be anti-capitalist, but what the OWS has shown us is that some capitalists are more equal than others.
Haven't seen the movie yet, but I've always loved the Muppets. I definitely think more of it should be on than The Situation and Jershey Shore (how in the world did that guy become famous anyway?).
I also think the criticism is overblown. Much of the movie's humor is derived from the gentle mocking of Hollywood convention. It would be very easy to argue that the evil oil baron is also a parody of "typical Hollywood." Especially when he has to have his two henchmen laugh manically for him, since he for some reason is incapable of doing so himself. At appropriate moments he says, "Maniacal laugh! Maniacal laugh!" – which they then do to comic effect.
C'mon, the GREEDY business just HAD to be oil drilling, didn't it? Hey, don't spoil the big meaningful ending but is the business the Muppets bring back a non-profit that DOES NOT pay taxes?
No doubt it's a funny movie, but are there gay characters, too? Or just slightly fey? Seriously, kid's entertainment is anything but these days, and we're supposed to just go along to get along, right? Sorry, no thanks. This society is sick and the little kids who are being trained that oil is bad and that nonprofits are superior will end up paying higher gas prices and all the taxes for this wonderful DEBT. So the Muppets are helping to "Sandusky" little kids. Great.
Following their logic, they should have an even bigger problem with Dicken's Christmas Carol, given the character of Scrooge. Should that also become taboo reading?
Great analysis on the silliness that sometimes infects those both on the left and right. The "Occupy Hollywood" crowd is no different than the "Occupy Wall Street" bunch, other than their bathing rituals, of course. To the OWS crowd, I say earn a degree that will allow you to be marketable and become part of the 1% (which would actually increase it, I suppose). To the OH bunch, I'd recommend attending a film school and make a movie that is more aligned with your own ideology (which would help balance the liberal scale of Hollywood, of course).
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAlso, I was happy to read that the "Halloween, Pumpkin Witch" did not succumb to Communism. Hallelujah. :-)
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBeverly Hills: Leftist enclave
Manufacturing: One industry that Leftists have fond memories
Fashion Designer: Definitely dominated by Leftists
Evil, rich oil magnate: Definitely a belief by Leftists
No, the movie may *not* be anti-capitalist, but what the OWS has shown us is that some capitalists are more equal than others.
Haven't seen the movie yet, but I've always loved the Muppets. I definitely think more of it should be on than The Situation and Jershey Shore (how in the world did that guy become famous anyway?).
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI also think the criticism is overblown. Much of the movie's humor is derived from the gentle mocking of Hollywood convention. It would be very easy to argue that the evil oil baron is also a parody of "typical Hollywood." Especially when he has to have his two henchmen laugh manically for him, since he for some reason is incapable of doing so himself. At appropriate moments he says, "Maniacal laugh! Maniacal laugh!" – which they then do to comic effect.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI don't think it's that off-base.
In "Cars 2" earlier this year, kids were told that regular gas was BAD, alternative fuels are GOOD.
Here they're learning:
"Tex Richman":
Tex - BAD
Rich Man - Bad
Oil Company - Bad
Drilling for Oil - Bad
I mean if we all were just in entertainment and fashion, everything would be wonderful and oh so GREEN.
The message may be subtle, but it's definitely there; perhaps not anti-corporate but definitely anti-rich person and anti-oil.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseC'mon, the GREEDY business just HAD to be oil drilling, didn't it? Hey, don't spoil the big meaningful ending but is the business the Muppets bring back a non-profit that DOES NOT pay taxes?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseNo doubt it's a funny movie, but are there gay characters, too? Or just slightly fey? Seriously, kid's entertainment is anything but these days, and we're supposed to just go along to get along, right? Sorry, no thanks. This society is sick and the little kids who are being trained that oil is bad and that nonprofits are superior will end up paying higher gas prices and all the taxes for this wonderful DEBT. So the Muppets are helping to "Sandusky" little kids. Great.
Following their logic, they should have an even bigger problem with Dicken's Christmas Carol, given the character of Scrooge. Should that also become taboo reading?
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse