Baldwin apologized to his fellow passengers he inconvenienced with his tempter-tantrum over at the HuffPo. An excerpt:
I suppose a part of my frustration lay with the fact that I had flown American for over 20 years and was brand loyal, in the extreme. The ticketing agents and Admiral’s Club staff have always been nothing but abundantly helpful to me, as I have flown hundreds of thousands of miles with the one carrier.
Amazing. Mr. 99% had fantastic service as a Hollywood celebrity in the airline’s exclusive club for frequent fliers. How ever did he get so lucky?
And. . .
However, I have learned a valuable lesson. Airlines in the US are struggling with fuel costs, labor costs, bankruptcies, you name it. It’s no secret that the level of service on US carriers has deteriorated to a point that would make Howard Hughes red-faced. Filthy planes, barely edible meals, cuts in jet service to less-traveled locations. One of the big changes, in my time, is in the increase of the post-9/11, paramilitary bearing of much of the air travel business. September 11th was a horrific day in the airline industry, yet in the wake of that event, I believe carriers and airports have used that as an excuse to make the air travel experience as inelegant as possible.
Yes, that’s it. After 9/11, it’s the airlines who want to make flying “inelegant” for flyers. In the history of commerce, that’s how it usually works, right? The seller of the product tries to make that product as crappy as possible. The wonderful and omnipotent Federal government that Baldwin and his ilk deify had nothing to do with the post 9/11 environment while flying? Do morons like Baldwin actually believe this?
Baldwin continues . . .
Most of the flight attendants I have ever encountered still have some remnant of the old idea of service. Add to that the notion that in this day and age, many people have a lot of important work to do, by phone, and would like to do so till the last possible minute. But there are many now who walk the aisles of an airplane with a whistle around their neck and a clipboard in their hands and they have made flying a Greyhound bus experience.
The lesson I’ve learned is to keep my phone off when the 1950′s gym teacher is on duty. That was my fault there, even though this trip was quite a bit different from so many others.
First of all, Baldwin was playing — by his own admission on Twitter – the game “Words with Friends” on his phone. That’s his important work? But for someone like Baldwin who has been championing the disparities in wealth in this country to then go on and disparage the “Greyhound bus experience” as well as another attack on the flight attendant is just inexcusable. Sorry, pal, if everyone in this country can’t afford the Admiral’s Club lifestyle.
What’s worse is that Arianna Huffington gave Baldwin the space to continue his attack on this woman. If Huffington had any decency, she’d point out that the flight attendant — who we’ve yet to hear from — was just doing her job and it was Baldwin who was not only wrong, but overwhelmingly so.
We’ll see if that ever happens.
Check out the comments on Huffpo..... seem to be running 90/10 in favor of his stupidity.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThanks
Pete
More evidence that Alec Baldwin is a tool (as if we needed any after his rant at his daughter) -- he picks on the flight attendant for doing her job, mandated by the government, which if she does not do, she can be disciplined up to firing. And he has the gall to wonder why these abused employees (by their customers mostly) are grumpy and less than pleasant at times? I have over 1 Million miles on American and because of my "loyalty" often get to watch other jerks like him be self absorbed in first class. Get a clue.
The guy in the comments on the previous post who wants us to lighten up on Alec, should really think again. FAA rules are a bunch of BS and are at times senseless, but they are the rules and the flight attendants should not be abused for enforcing rules that they have no control over.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseBaldwin's got to be the only actor that in real life actually transcends his "South Park" character.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThis guy just keeps on giving; the LA Times reports that he will be the US"host" (on the Discovery Channel) of the British documentary "Frozen Planet," which is actually hosted by David Attenborough, in the UK. The Bard's phrase "Hyperion to a satyr" comes to mind. This is the second time Discovery has pulled this type of stunt, the last being when they had Oprah narrate Mr. Attenborough's previous multi-part nature documentary. Apparently Discovery thinks America audiences are two stupid to understand English English.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI just read in People Magazine that American Airlines is involved in transporting dogs from Afghanistan to the U.S. for soldiers that became attached to them during their tours of duty. Corporate greed at work, right Alec?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy does the FAA require that cell phones be turned off during takeoff and landing. Give you a hint, what phase of flight does the majority of accidents occur? Bingo, if you guessed takeoff and landing. When you’re traveling at 200 feet a second and a few hundred feet off the ground, you don’t have time to think about it.
It is not that a properly operating single cell phone is going to screw up the avionics of a modern jetliner. It is rather a chance that a malfunctioning or a group of phones would cause an unrecoverable error.
The incredible safety of air travel is maintained by creating redundant layers of procedures and equipment so that any one, or two failures does not cause an accident. Accident chains are usually three deep.
1) My cell phone is on
2) It malfunctioned and blasted RF energy in unexpected ways
3) It interfered with the glide slop function of the ILS
4) The plane crashed short of the runway by 500 feet because it thought it was higher
There is 80 years risk management practices distilled down into the rather harsh, inflexible rule to turn off your (20 year old tech) cell phone.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseWhy does the FAA require that cell phones be turned off during takeoff and landing. Give you a hint, what phase of flight does the majority of accidents occur? Bingo, if you guessed takeoff and landing. When you’re traveling at 200 feet a second and a few hundred feet off the ground, you don’t have time to think about it.
It is not that a properly operating single cell phone is going to screw up the avionics of a modern jetliner. It is rather a chance that a malfunctioning or a group of phones would cause an unrecoverable error.
The incredible safety of air travel is maintained by creating redundant layers of procedures and equipment so that any one, or two failures does not cause an accident. Accident chains are usually three deep.
1) My cell phone is on
2) It malfunctioned and blasted RF energy in unexpected ways
3) It interfered with the glide slop function of the ILS
4) The plane crashed short of the runway by 500 feet because it thought it was higher
There is 80 years risk management practices distilled down into the rather harsh, inflexible rule to turn off your (20 year old tech) cell phone.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse