Google+
Close

Media Blog

NRO’s MSM watchdog.

The Most Dangerous War in the History of Journalism?



Text  



So claims The Independent, the leftwing British daily, in a lengthy report today:

The Iraq conflict has become the deadliest by far for the media trying to cover it, with more than 200 journalists killed to date. To put this in perspective, two were killed in the First World War, 68 in the Second, 77 in Vietnam and 36 in the Balkans. And the toll in Iraq shows no sign of declining. It is, if anything, rising. Five journalists were killed in separate attacks in just one day last month.

Is this perhaps a belated recognition that the Islamic terror groups and militias deliberately targeting journalists are not as open to reason as some in the leftist western media would have as believe?

The Independent, who many have accused of hitherto being somewhat soft on terrorism, continues:

Some famous journalists have lost their lives reporting conflicts – Robert Capa in the first Indochina war; Ernie Pyle on the island of Okinawa in the Second World War; Larry Burrows in Vietnam. But what makes Iraq more dangerous than the others is that the deaths are not accidental collateral damage from stray shells or from reporters being caught up in the fighting. Instead, many have been specifically targeted because of what they had reported or because they came from the wrong side of the sectarian divide. They are killed in drive-by shootings or abducted and executed, often after being tortured. There are little or no investigations into the attacks, creating impunity for the killers from the Shia or Sunni militant groups or government run death squads.



Text  


Subscribe to National Review