So, in my first post as an in-house critic from the right at TNR, I took on what I thought was a pretty alarmist piece in the magazine on global warming by Al Gore.
Joe Romm responded at length, employing a number of exclamation points. He covers a lot of the same ground that we did in a very detailed exchange two years ago, in which I made a set of claims, he interrogated them, I counter-interrogated, and so on. You can read the back-and-forth – me, Romm, me, Romm, me – and decide for yourself if you think I ought to spend my time interacting with him.
Obviously I’m incapable of objectivity on this subject, but it doesn’t seem to me that any of these criticisms have disproven any of my central claims.