|
![]() |
|
|
While Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan did comment on the dollar in his congressional testimony Tuesday, he did not address the future supply of dollars which is critical in determining the dollar's value. More, Greenspan didn't give any sense that he disapproves of the wild fluctuations in the value of the dollar in recent years. On the forecasting of exchange rates, Greenspan said that the Fed would keep out of that business. "It is really remarkable how difficult it is to forecast (exchange rates)," he said, "which is another way of saying how successful the markets have become in absorbing the knowledge that everyone has about supply and demand for currency, supply and demand for goods and services, imports and exports." However, the markets don't really have that much concrete knowledge about the future supply of currency, leaving the dollar unstable and momentum-driven. Greenspan also distanced the Fed from a position on the new euro parity, saying, "The particular issue of what the actual exchange-rate number is is wholly arbitrary. So that the fact that it is above or less than 1.0 has no economic significance whatsoever." Truth be told, parity
itself is not significant (remember the hullabaloo about Dow 10,000 and
Nasdaq 5,000). But the perception of a weakening dollar trend as it passes
through milestones like euro parity is where there's continued concern. Financial markets should not be expected to set the value of the dollar. Washington has a 100% iron-clad monopoly on the supply of dollars and therefore has an immense influence on its value. A simple statement that "currency stability is at the core of an economic growth program" would go a long way toward rebuilding investor confidence. Mr. Malpass is the Chief International Economist for Bear Stearns.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||