he
Bank of Japan has been injecting overnight liquidity heavily since
the September 11 tragedy. Separately, Japan has been intervening in
foreign exchange markets, selling yen to buy dollars. In dollar terms,
Japan's equities are back near their September 10 level. The liquidity
injections are helpful for now.
But the key
issue in turning bullish on Japan is whether it is in the process
of making a permanent change to a non-deflationary monetary policy.
If it did, Japan could begin adding to the world economy rather
than subtracting from it, with positive financial market implications.
In recent
days, the Bank of Japan has caused excess reserves to rise beyond
10 trillion yen, exceeding the 6 trillion yen target established
in mid-August. It looks like this will turn out to be a temporary
injection similar to the U.S. Federal Reserve's recent short-term
injections. For a few days following September 11, the Fed allowed
the fed funds rate to fall below the 3% target; then it reversed
the injections and began enforcing the 3% target, a very high real
interest rate.
As in the
U.S., Japan's extra liquidity is probably just a temporary response
to September 11 and to abnormally large liquidity needs related
to the half-year that ended on September 30. In past half-year instances,
Japan has given the impression of constructive monetary policy changes,
then promptly reinstalled a deflationary policy.
For example,
in March 1999, the Bank of Japan injected overnight liquidity, cut
the interest rate fractionally, and allowed a public discussion
of a shift from interest-rate targeting to quantitative -- then
it reversed the impact. In March 2001, the BOJ finally shifted to
a quantitative target, but set a deflationary level and left it
unchanged for five months.
Japan's economic
problems are primarily the result of a deflationary monetary policy
and will not be solved by fiscal stimulus or the proposed reforms
in the banking system. Japan was already in a deflation and recession
(most likely a deep one) prior to September 11. The economy shrank
at a 3.2% annual rate in the second quarter and the downturn probably
accelerated in the third quarter.
On September
28 (Japan time), the government released September inflation data
(actually deflation data) for Tokyo showing a 0.2% decline in prices
in September from August and a 1.2% decline over the last 12 months.
Housing rents and personal computer prices led the September price
cuts.
Also on September
28, the government released industrial production data for August
showing an 11.7% decline from August 2000, substantially worse than
expectations. Unemployment remained at 5% in August.
On September
27, Japan reported a worse-than-expected 3.4% decline in August
retail sales versus August 2000. This continued the long-term stagnation
pattern of the 1990s. It fugures that shrinking consumption is a
response to the deflationary monetary policy, as deflation makes
the consumer wary about their jobs and gives them a price incentive
to delay consumption.
The forward-looking
Tankan survey of business sentiment released on October 1 gave another
indication of Japan's deepening recession. It showed sentiment down
substantially at both large a small Japanese businesses, suggesting
that the recession will deepen unless Japan maintains the constructive
monetary stimulus of recent days.
To restart
the economy, the BOJ should adopt a stimulative monetary policy,
a step Japan still hasn't tried despite ten years of deflation and
stagnation. Even though interest rates are at 0%, the monetary policy
is tight in terms of real interest rates (factoring in the deflation)
and in terms of the cumulative appreciation of the yen in the 1990s.
To become
stimulative, the BOJ could expand the supply of yen by buying Japanese
government bonds and dollars, making clear that these mechanisms
will provide long-term liquidity (not short-term) until deflation
stops. It would also need to make clear that it would be able to
withdraw liquidity to avoid excessive yen weakness or inflation.
Those advocating a yen devaluation or an inflation target are wrong.
These would be destabilizing, especially given the global recession.
|