 |
|
February
5, 2003 2:00 p.m.
A
Hawkish Powell
The
U.N. will fall behind or be left behind.
|
|
 fter
Secretary Powell's speech to the U.N. Security Council, Bob Woodward remarked
that the United States still had not provided a "smoking gun."
This of course misses an important point, indeed the only one that really
matters. Under the U.N. resolutions presently in force, the United States
is not required to prove that Iraq possesses weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam is obligated to prove that he doesn't.
But the comment reveals
something else that those who seek unanimity are just going to have to
accept. There are people out there who would not be convinced of what
Sec. Powell called the "nexus" of Iraq, terror, and poisons
if they saw a photo of Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, and Mohammed Atta
sipping tea together at an Iraqi chemical plant.
But the professional
deniers were not the target of Secretary Powell's speech. The target was
instead what an old document called a "candid world," that part
of mankind that is open to reasonable discourse and which can be convinced
by reasonable evidence (it is instructive to note that when this old document
first employed the phrase "candid world," the French were included).
And it seems to me that a candid world would have to agree that the secretary's
evidence was overwhelming.
The details of Sec.
Powell's speech are available elsewhere, so I will only make a few points.
First it did effectively illustrate the Iraq-terror-poison nexus. As the
vernacular would have it, he "connected the dots." But he went
farther in an attempt to shame the U.N. into standing up for the principles
people attribute to the organization. He invoked Saddam's record on human
rights. It seems to me that the countries in the U.N. will fall in behind
the United States when it comes to war, or it will lose what little legitimacy
and credibility it has remaining.
There was an unmistakably
important visual aspect of the speech. Sitting behind Sec. Powell was
none other than DCI George Tenet, whose CIA has been portrayed as skeptical
of the link between Iraq and terror. This coupled with the fact that Sec.
Powell has sounded more "hawkish" of late (having been sandbagged
by his pals, the French and Germans, who could blame him) sends an important
message to Iraq and the ditherers of the world who support it: Your time
is up.
—
Mackubin Thomas Owens, an NRO contributing editor, is a professor of strategy
and force planning at the Naval War College in Newport, RI. His observations
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Naval War College or the Department
of Defense.
|
<% dim printurl
printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>
