March
12, 2003 9:45 a.m. Enter
MOAB
Part
of the “shock and awe.”
he
Pentagon has been using the term "shock and awe" to describe
the campaign military planners envision for the approaching war with Iraq.
We may just have gotten an idea about what this means: On Tuesday, the
Air Force tested what is described as the most powerful conventional weapon
in the U.S. arsenal, the so-called Massive
Ordnance Air-burst Bomb or MOAB. This weapon, tested at Eglin Air
Force Base in the Florida panhandle, is also apparently known as the "mother
of all bombs."
The MOAB is a follow-on
to the BLU-82 "daisy-cutter," a 15,000-pound fuel-air-explosive
weapon originally designed to clear helicopter-landing zones in Vietnam.
The daisy cutter also saw action in the first Gulf War and more recently
in Afghanistan, where along with the BLU-118/B thermobaric weapon, it
was used against al Qaeda troops in fortified caves.
Weighing in at 21,000 pounds, the MOAB is packed with some 18,000 pounds
of a gelled slurry of ammonium nitrate and powdered aluminum that is detonated
by a highly explosive booster. It is satellite guided. The MOAB delivery
package consists of an inertial guidance system, a global-positioning
system, and fins and wings for course adjustment, making it extremely
accurate. Like the BLU-82, it can be dropped by parachute from a C-130
transport plane before the satellite-guidance system takes over. Some
reports indicate that it does not need a parachute.
The MOAB seems to be a blast-only version of a weapon designed to destroy
buried hardened targets. This so-called direct-strike hard-target weapon
(DSHTW) features a cobalt-alloy bomb body that enables it to penetrate
to depths of up to 100-feet underground before detonating.
Defense officials reportedly describe the purpose of the weapon as primarily
"psychological." The daisy cutter was employed in such a role
during the 1991 Gulf War. DoD has certainly made no effort to keep the
effects of this weapon secret. This lack of secrecy meshes with another
recent news report claiming that a centerpiece of a campaign of shock
and awe would be the purposeful destruction of an Iraqi Republican Guard
unit as an incentive to others to surrender. A fuel-air explosion of the
magnitude generated by a MOAB resembles a small nuclear detonation. If
I were on the receiving end of such a weapon, or observed the effects
of a MOAB strike, that would certainly seem like shock and awe to me.
—
Mackubin Thomas Owens, an NRO contributing editor, is on leave from the
Naval War College in Newport, R.I., to write a history of U.S. civil-military
relations.
<% dim printurl
printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>
he
Pentagon has been using the term "shock and awe" to describe
the campaign military planners envision for the approaching war with Iraq.
We may just have gotten an idea about what this means: On Tuesday, the
Air Force tested what is described as the most powerful conventional weapon
in the U.S. arsenal, the so-called 
