Today’s Wall Street Journal includes this letter of mine:
Soon You Will Need a Master’s Degree to Wash Dishes
Eric Felten’s excellent “Now College Is the Break” (Postmodern Times, Feb. 11) leaves an apparent paradox hanging in the air. If large numbers of college students are studying little and learning almost nothing of lasting benefit, how can it be that “the reward for the collegiate credential has been going up”?
Many politicians and the higher education establishment keep saying that college is a “great investment” because, on average, college grads earn significantly more over their lifetimes than do workers without degrees. They attribute that to the advanced skills and knowledge that college supposedly imparts. The trouble is that large numbers of college graduates are perilously weak in basic skills. They don’t read well, don’t write coherently and can’t handle simple math problems. It is hard to believe that employers are paying premium salaries for workers with such limited human capital.
The explanation, I submit, is that the earnings disparity is not due to the high skills of college graduates (although some certainly do have them), but rather that over the last several decades good opportunities for people who don’t have college degrees have been vanishing. Fifty years ago, hardly any career paths in the business world were foreclosed to people without a college degree, but today we find that few career paths remain open.
That is because credential inflation has set in with a vengeance. Many firms now require that applicants have college degrees, even for work that calls for nothing more than basic trainability. Those who don’t have college credentials are confined to an increasingly narrow segment of the labor force where the prospects for great advancement are bleak.
Companies are using college degrees as signals that job applications are both intelligent and self-disciplined. I'm retired from a large company. Once, I crafted a short exam to try to test basic skills of people coming for job interviews. I was quickly told that any type of exam was strictly forbidden: we might get sued for exam bias.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseHeavy Axle is correct and the reason is the 1971 Supreme Court ruling in Griggs v. Duke Power that turned aptitude testing into a legal minefield for employers. Using college credentials used to be a fairly good substitute for testing since it used to be the case that college grads were fairly dependably literate and numerate. That, of course, is no longer true.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseCredential inflation is spiraling out of control just as the cost to attend college is. Consider the devastating consequence: Kids are graduating from college with record high levels of debt just as the utility and marginal earning-power of their degrees reaches a record low. And yet, Obama and other "leaders" continue to cling hopelessly to their dogmatic goal of sending even more kids to college.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseAnyone else connecting this to what's going on in WI?
Teachers (for obvious reasons) have hidden behind credentialsim for years. Despite the fact that it offers no value to their position, they have clamored that it entitles them to a higher salary.
I can understand why they'd want a return on their investment of time and money...but in the end it was a mistake. Their mistake. Don't pawn that off on the rest of us.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse