There is something really off about this case. It needs to be investigated and audited.

"Everything I have said in regards to my involvement in Meredith’s death, even though it is contrasting, are the best truth that I have been able to think." (Amanda Knox, 6 November 2007).

No one believes they're guilty anymore. Candace Dempsey and Bruce Fisher didn't know these families before their involvement in this case. I'm not sure if Candace has ever met with them, (she probably has) but Bruce hasn't. This is deception loud and clear. It discredits these crazy hate groups all the more.
They (Candace and Bruce) came in unbiased, and their conclusions were that there are innocent kids wrongly imprisoned.
This....is true justice for Meredith.

Regardless of anyone's personal opinion on the Bruce Fisher book, the author is quite real and authentic. I am both fascinated and impressed that his detractors have taken the time read his book. I await my copy of the newly released item.

Steve Shay
West Seattle Herald

Ms. Iannone,

Could you please detail why you think the two are innocent? That is, introduce the pieces of evidence that were used to convict them, and critique why you think these pieces of evidence point to their innocence.

I understand you are reviewing a book here, but your reasons for assuming innocence are recapitulations of many unsubstantiated theories.

If you read Fisher's and Dempsey's books, then you can surely provide some evidence of your newfound innocence in regards to Sollecito and Knox.

Reckless and Negligent evidence collection.
The Perugia Flying Squad didn’t bag HALF of the clothes Meredith Kercher was wearing the night she was attacked until 6 week or more after the murder and some items were never tested at all.

Primary evidence not bagged until six weeks or later after the murder: A light blue jacket worn while attacked, both socks, bra clasp, brown leather purse with bloody prints on it and puma shoes. A beige tote bag that was used that night was never tested. No record on testing the long sleeve t-shirt the victim was wearing. A bloody towel was collected but not stored correctly and allowed to rot

Items retrieved six weeks later on Dec 18th:
Light blue jacket the victim was wearing when attacked and that was forcibly removed with both arms of the jacket turned inside out. It was originally photographed on the floor near the victim’s head. The forensic team pulled it out of a laundry hamper on Dec 18th. What kind of forensic storage method is this?! Then they threw it on the floor before one of them finally decided to collect it. Rudy Guede’s DNA was later found on a cuff.

One sock came out from under the bed. A pile of clothes was placed on top of the bed and shoes beside and under it. A pair of bloody boots Meredith’s head was found resting on were also thrown in the pile. The sock would have been removed by Meredith’s killer and had blood on the cuff but was carelessly shoved under the bed with many other items far from where it was originally seen on Nov 2.

The second sock and BRA CLASP were found tangled under a rug by the desk, moved from their original location.
A brown leather purse that had been OPENED AND HAD BLOOD near the zipper was finally collected six weeks later. It had been moved from its original location. Why would it not be a top priority to see who opened the purse and stole the money?

The red and white puma shoes Meredith was wearing were in a pile of shoes by the bed on Dec 18th, even though they had spots of blood on them. One of them was still tied showing that the victim was wearing them when attacked.

The beige tote bag was never tested even though the killer may have looked through it to find KEYS needed to leave the cottage.

If this was YOUR daughter or sister would it be acceptable to NOT immediately bag and process the clothes they was wearing when attacked in order to find the killer? There is simply no acceptable explanation for this level of negligence. It is stunning and egregious.

Ms. Iannone,

The most striking thing to me about this case is how much the defendants, especially Ms. Knox, were demonized. The second most striking thing was how many of the leaks in the first few weeks of the case were warmed over bologna.

Norbert has spoken falsely. Ms. Dempsey used the court transcripts in the writing of her book and covered many of the court dates.

This case has brought out many strong opinions on both sides. The more one follows the case, however, the more one realizes that those who really look intelligently at the reported facts of the case conclude Amanda and her former boyfriend are innocent. On the other hand, the contingent who continue to militate for them to be kept in prison repeat and keep repeating lies and misinformation that was passed around by disreputable persons and media almost right from the beginning. What is more, when the things they say are refuted by reliable information and sound logic, they resort to personal attacks and various attempts to silence those who support innocence.

The mental set of those who continue to profess guilt and to incite cruelty against Amanda, her former boyfriend, their families and those who have formed an opinion in favour of innocence, is truly troubling. In many ways the people who troll the internet in an effort to continue the brutal treatment of Amanda Knox show themselves to be the sort of people they accuse Amanda of being. All things being equal, I would prefer to share my community and my neighbourhood with Amanda, her former boyfriend Raffaele and their families, than with the people who think it is alright that they should not only be kept in prison, but in many cases, who would deny them the right to argue their innocence on appeal according to law.

Norbert,

Can you back up your claim that some have been paid? If not, the honorable thing to do is to withdraw it and apologize. Here are some examples of my claim: the bleach receipts that did not exist, the Harry Potter book that was right where Ms. Knox said it was all along, the CCT footage that supposedly showed Ms. Knox at her flat...