Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Phi Beta Cons

The Right take on higher education.


Print   |  Text
 

Mad Nonsense

I was recently reminded of the scene in Mad Men in which the meticulously dressed Draper family enjoys an irenic picnic together in a beautiful suburban park. When the picnic is over and the family is ready to leave, mother Betty gathers their considerable load of trash and tosses it to the winds, letting it float all over the immaculate grassy lawn. When I first read about this scene months ago, it sounded preposterous to me, and it looked even more preposterous when I finally caught up with the series on DVD.

Plus, I learned that Betty is supposed to be a graduate of Bryn Mawr, in anthropology, no less. Honestly, this level of littering in a pristine suburban park, which, according to the givens of the series is probably located in well-off Westchester County (the Elysian Fields, if you grew up in the Bronx), would be unimaginable for even a high-school dropout of those days. But for a snooty, perfectly groomed Seven Sisters graduate?

This may seem like a trivial point, but it is important to expose the intense propaganda of today’s television shows, designed to make us present-day people feel superior to those in the past, so we will be more content with the chaos of the postmodern, post-countercultural world we now inhabit. And it should also alert us to more serious fabrications and veritable snow-jobs, such as those concerning the condition of women.  

New on Phi Beta Cons. . .


COMMENTS   40

EXPAND  

   09/29/11 16:28

That's a very good observation, Carol. The Left is at great pains to demonstrate that the Leftist convulsions of the late 60s ushered in a better America. And I know from personal experience that nothing enrages a Leftist more than telling him the United States was a better place in 1961 than it is in 2011, which, of course, it was.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/30/11 14:36

I'm sorry, but 1961 America is a much more troubled place than is 2011 America. Yes, we have problems, but that America had institutional barriers to achievement for large segments of our population. We need to perfect the time we have, not romanticize the past.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Chuck Pelto
   10/01/11 08:01

TO: Buckeye Guy
RE: WRONG!

....1961 America is a much more troubled place than is 2011 America. -- Buckeye Guy

Where were YOU in '62?

• We didn't have Columbine shootings.
• We didn't have drive-by shootings.
• We didn't have the AIDS epidemic.
• We didn't have 38% illiteracy amongst high school graduates who need remedial English before they can take college-level courses.
• We didn't have a teenage girl pregnancy rate that was outrageously high.
• We didn't have anywhere near the number of single parent mothers trying to raise sons and failing miserably.
• We didn't have Latin American drug gangs invading our cities spreading death by drugs and/or violence.

That's just the SHORT LIST....

Regards,

Chuck(le)
[The future isn't what it used to be.]

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Jack Bunce
   10/01/11 09:40

Having lived through the 1960s as a young adult I find this time much more troubling than the 1960s in America. The changes necessary back then were those which would bring the country into alignment with its basic founding principles. As such there was a certain feeling of inevitability about them. Today those who wish change seem to be in support of other principles incongruent with those upon which this Republic was founded and flourished.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/01/11 12:02

"We need to perfect the time we have, not romanticize the past."

There's yer Progressive Delusion, right there.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/01/11 13:19

"When the perfect comes, the imperfect will pass away." --
Not in my lifetime, though.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Marvland
   10/01/11 13:32

Well stated. 1961 America was not the peak. Longing for that time does no good. Unless we find the magical social conservative time machine that they all wish we had. I have very little patience for this kind of banter. The United States was a growing and confused place, which we will always be. No need to whitewash it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/29/11 17:22

I find Mad Men best understood as a parody--an immitation of the times for ridicule. To view it as a period piece or a take on the culture of the early 1960s, is to be lured into the trap of today's superiority complex (the opposite of an inferiority complex, IYKWIM). The fact that the actors play it straight--yet with today's massive narcissism and ego, is a dead give away for me.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
crackermike
   10/01/11 10:45

I happen to agree with Mark Mothersbaugh, founder of the music group Devo. American Culture peaked in 1965 and has been devolving into barbarism ever since. Certainly in 1965 the level of education, politeness, tolerance and civility were orders of magnitude greater than today. Under liberalism/progressivism, the USA has become a coarsened, distorted, barbarous perversion of it's true nature. Thanks Democrats, thanks Hollywood, thanks Washington DC, You have nearly completed your desire to animalize our Grand Republic.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/01/11 12:26

I agree. The so-called authenticity of Mad Men amounts only to the art direction, however well-acted or well-written it may be. Today's bien pensant sensibilities inform the dialogue, circumstances, and attitudes of the show -- cartoonish portrayals of a time and place about which the writers have no insight or knowledge.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Aarradin
   09/29/11 18:05

Have you seen the new season opener of Boardwalk Empire?

They have the KKK in Atlantic City, NJ, working hand in hand with the Republican Party...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Jim_
   10/01/11 09:10

The KKK did have a short period - maybe 5 years in the 1920's - when it was a burgeoning national force. I know that some states not in the list of usual suspects - Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts - had very formidable Klan presences, but can't speak to the historical accuracy of Altantic City. I know Worcester, MA is one place they took over briefly. Its focus in the 1920s was anti-Catholic, anti-Immigrant, and anti-Jew, along with its historical anti-Black stance, and its effect on the 1924 Democratic National Convention, was comparable to the effect of the leftist radicals on the Dem's 1968 convention.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
RyanInB
   10/01/11 09:31

And even more ahistorical, they were working with CATHOLICS.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
motuguzzi
   10/01/11 11:17

Why would the KKK switch sides? They were the unofficial enforcement arm of the Democratic party in the years ofter the Civil War (when they lynched freed slaves and Republicans) all the way thru the 60's.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/01/11 13:59

Shouldn't they have been in West Virginia, working hand in hand with rising young kleagle Robert Byrd?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/30/11 15:11

There was far more to America than Jim Crow in the deep south. We got rid of that with the civil rights acts of '64 and '65, but we've also gotten a nation awash in crime, drug abuse, gangs, broken families, illegal immigration, out-of-wedlock children, single mothers, and welfare doles. We've conjured a burgeoning entitlement state, a tottering economy, urban sprawl, the decay of civil society, manners and common decency, and a popular culture that is by turns coarse, vapid and ugly. Additionally, we've got a guy named Obama who is worsening all of the above and will probably do so for another five years. And that's just off the top of my head.

I don't care for what America has become over the course of the last several decades, and I am far from alone in disdaining the postmodern present and sorrowing for the good that has been destroyed.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Suburbanbanshee
   10/01/11 08:00

But the point is, no matter how many problems that 1961 America had, littering a public park wasn't one of them. Littering along highways, by throwing stuff out the window, maybe.

Littering in parks was part of the loss of American pride and concern for others that was characteristic of, say, motorcycle toughs, drug users, and the more obnoxious sort of hippies. It was fostered by cities not wanting to pay to empty public trashcans, clean streets, etc. during the lean years, and in some places by getting tired of cleaning up after crime and riots.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/01/11 08:26

I thought the same thing when I saw that episode. It was not beliveable. I was a child then. (I could have been Sally) and I remember quite vividly the "Don't be a Litterbug" campaign. I think if they had wanted to be more realistic about the message they were trying to portray, they would have scattered litter on a Highway (or just used an actual highway in Philadelphia, dirty, dirty city) and then they would have had the children roll down the windows of the car and through candy wrappers out the window. That was the true thrust of the 'Don't be a Litterbug.' I remember my mom actually getting a bag for trash for our trips and making us promise to never roll down the window to throw trash. As we drove on family trips, we often saw gum wrappers, cigarette butts and candy bar wrappers floating out of the cars in front of us. I can still see the giant Bee on the bill boards. I think that was a very successful advertising campaign!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Old Fert
   10/01/11 08:35

Ah, littering. One of the cardinal sins.
During Desert Shield, we were often reminded to keep our trash (MRE packages, whatever) in our vehicles until we could get to a spot to dispose of them properly.
When our support-unit convoy crossed the berm going into Iraq in '91 our soldiers exhibited their hostility and disdain for Iraq by dumping the couple-of-days worth of trash out the door. Littering the desert. I'm not sure if it was consciously intended or not, but it was obvious that we were showing our complete lack of respect for Saddam. But since we weren't in a position to be shooting at anyone, we did what we could. We littered on the SOBs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Oliver Heaviside
   10/01/11 08:37

I am the same age as the boy in MM; IOW born in the early fifties. Our nice middle-class family threw gum wrappers out the car window, etc. It was not considered bad.

Lady Bird Johnson started the anti-litter, keep-America-Beautiful campaign. I well remember a time when gas stations and other businesses started giving away in-car litter bags, as a promotional item, as part of the anti-little campaign.

So I'd say MM is spot-on in this little detail.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact