Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Phi Beta Cons

The Right take on higher education.


Print   |  Text
 

Law-School Curriculum Gets Better and Better!

Here is a new course that will be offered to Suffolk Law School:

Dear Students,

A new course offering has been added to the Spring 2012 schedule. Professor Marc Rodwin will be teaching Civil Disobedience on Mondays and Wednesdays 4:00-5:15pm. If you would like to register for this course selection you may go on to Campus Cruiser until midnight, November 23, 2011 or please visit the Registrar’s Office after the Thanksgiving Break.

Sincerely,

Lorraine D. Cove
Assistant Dean and Registrar
Suffolk University Law School

New on Phi Beta Cons. . .


COMMENTS   2

EXPAND  

   11/28/11 20:39

Looking at the course catalog's description, this doesn't seem overly objectionable. I don't see anything flagrantly liberal in the professor's biographical sketch (even though I admit that I might not be the best judge of that matter).

Am I missing something, or is the entire concept of civil disobedience off-limits because groups with whom we disagree employ aspects of it in a distasteful manner?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/29/11 23:15

I don't see the problem either. It'd be different if the students were assigned (thus ordered) to go out and engage in an act of civil disobedience, but they're not. It's a law school elective on an interesting topic. Would the students have better job prospects if they took a course on, say, tax law? Maybe, but that's their decision.

I remember covering civil disobedience in an undergraduate course on law, and it was one of the most fascinating parts of the course, largely because it raised so many fundamental issues: What is the difference between law and ethics? When is it acceptable to break the law? What is an unjust law, and how do you identify one? Was Thoreau right? Was Gandhi? Was Martin Luther King? Okay, what if George Wallace had refused to move out of the schoolhouse door?

Those questions are important enough, but behind them are absolutely vital questions about the unreliability of law and the fallibility of human reason. I don't see why it's a bad idea for a future lawyer to give that some thought.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact