Rita Kramer lays bare Two Big Propaganda Lies:
Here in the United States we have witnessed the dismantling of an entire education system, from kindergarten through university, as its purpose has been redefined. The function of schooling is no longer seen to be the transmission of the culture of Western civilization, the history of its achievements and struggles, its literature and arts, of the evolution of the institutional framework of democracy and the cultivation of the skills required to understand and extend it. The function of the schools is now generally agreed to be achieving social change.
The schools have become an agency for the pursuit of radical egalitarianism …
The other Big Lie of the age is the imaginative construction of a people called the Palestinians. They started out as Arabs, akin to the Jordanians of the Hashemite Kingdom, before a mythology began to accrue to them. Displaced by the war raged by the Arabs against the new state of Israel, they could have been accommodated in Arab lands, just as the Jewish refugees from Egypt, Syria and other Arab countries were absorbed by Israel. But it was far more useful for their Arab brethren to keep them in camps . . . where their smoldering frustration could be supported, encouraged, and publicized so that, turned against Israel, it could be deflected from their true oppressors, their fellow Arabs. And they could excite the sympathy of the world as victims of an “occupation.”
Mid-East Studies Profs Infecting Schools
From Cinnamon Stillwell:
Public school children in grades K-12 are being assigned textbooks that misrepresent and, in some cases, glorify Islamic beliefs and history – often at the expense of other religions and cultures. The apologetics and indoctrination common in university Middle East studies programs is being carried into public schools by contentious, ahistorical, and inaccurate textbooks written by those same Middle East studies professors. History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond, a textbook published by the Teachers’ Curriculum Institute, was removed from the Scottsdale, Arizona school district in 2005 for this very reason.
Arab Prohibition on Pro-Terror Propaganda?
Arab League ministers have taken a significant, albeit tentative, step toward acknowledging that terrorism harms not only “infidels” but also that Arab countries are among its worst victims. At a conference last week, reports Amir Taheri, they proposed “a pan-Arab designation of all pro-terror propaganda as a distinct crime of incitement.”
Why has it taken so long for these leaders to face up to this long-standing danger?
[They] couldn’t agree on what constituted terrorism. They shied away from a clear definition for fear that it might apply to the various groups that they financed and armed against Israel, India – or, at times, against each other.
Nor were they willing to take a tough line on textbooks, media products and mosque sermons that incited xenophobia, hatred and violence against non-Muslims – and even, in some cases, against Muslims from different “schools.” They failed to realize that words have consequences in deeds, that individuals brainwashed into hating “the other” might end up trying to kill.
Doug Thomas, a professor at the University of Southern California, has created a video game for students aged 10-12 aiming to impart “ideas and skills not found in traditional textbooks.” As Deborah Lambert notes:
His game, Modern Prometheus, uses the story of Frankenstein to teach “ethical decision-making” by having the player “assume the role of Dr. Frankenstein’ assistant, who is forced to make a series of difficult choices that impact the game’s outcome.”
The assistants soon discovers a macabre element to the game, i.e. when they are forced into several dilemmas like deciding if they should steal body parts from a cemetery in order to help cure a widespread plague.
With all the electronic distractions around , we all understand the difficulty of getting students’ attention, not to mention teaching them right from wrong. But stealing body parts from the dead? Doesn’t the ingenious professor worry about giving kids nightmares?
A new documentary film, “Expelled,” will be released this spring. It features Ben Stein in an exploration showing that educators, scientists and students are being mocked, and even fired, for the “offense” of believing that there is evidence of design in creation.
Gary L. Bauer says the documentary:
exposes the truth about liberal academics who view the contention that Darwinism does not answer all life’s questions as proof of an impending theocracy in America. It also shows that the goal of many scientists who criticize creationism or Intelligent Design is to discredit religious belief altogether. In the end, Stein discovers that it is not just dissenters that are being expelled, but freedom itself. (American Values, January 25)
Wikipedia Rejects Muslim Censors
An entry in the online encyclopedia that includes images of the Prophet Muhammad is drawing worldwide protest at ThePetitionSite.com, reports the New York Times.
One protester writes, “It’s totally unacceptable to print the Prophet’s picture. It shows insensitivity towards Muslim feelings and should be removed immediately.”
Wikipedia is not backing down, asserting that it will not be “censored for the benefit of any particular group.”
Paul M. Cobb, who teaches Islamic history at Notre Dame, comments, “Islamic teaching has traditionally discouraged representation of humans, particularly Muhammad, but that doesn’t mean it’s nonexistent. Some of the most beautiful images in Islamic art are manuscript images of Muhammad.”
Kudos to Wikipedia.
Meyers on the Black Male Initiative
Robert commented below on the likely illegality of this CUNY program aimed at recruiting and retaining black male students. From the get-go, Michael Meyers of the New York Civil Rights Coalition has also pointed out such programs discriminate “against black men by segregating them and stigmatizing them.”
Stop Giving to Colleges
This blog has been home to some pretty extensive endowments discussion lately, so I figured I’d throw in my two cents. First off, I absolutely agree with George Leef’s reader that it’s not a good idea for the government to make universities’ decisions for them. Any time there’s a massive amount of money earning interest, there’s a serious tradeoff between spending money and leaving it to gather more interest, and colleges are best equipped to make that tradeoff with their futures in mind.
But a point I don’t think too many people have made is this: When a college gets a lot of money from donations and subsidies rather than tuition, there’s an incentive to shift resources from education to donor-luring. Yes, the two are linked (donors and governments will give more if they think the college is doing a good job), but seeing how universities waste money sometimes (diversity crusades, etc.), I wonder if there isn’t a better way to align incentives.
No, I’m not saying we should ban private gifts to schools. I’m saying it should happen voluntarily: If you want to donate money to further postsecondary education, contribute to scholarship funds, not directly to universities. Pick funds that use any criteria you like (merit, need), just put the money in the students’ hands. The same goes for government money — give out more vouchers and loans, rather than funding state and private schools.
Not only would this solve the massive-endowment problem, it would improve education; it would subsidize the consumer. Universities would have to sell themselves to students and parents, not alumni, philanthropists, and legislators.
Egalitarian Worrying at the New York Times
In yesterday’s New York Times, education writer Karen Arenson had this piece entitled “Endowments Widen a Higher Education Gap.”
This pours gasoline on the endowment-spending fire. How can good liberals resist the egalitarian urge to prevent any sort of “gap” from widening?
Arenson quotes Sandy Baum of Skidmore College: “You don’t have to go very far down the food chain before you get to institutions that feel real constraints about how they spend their money. Princeton can do what they want to, but not many schools can.”
Excuse my non-egalitarian nature, but so what? Why is it a problem that the great majority of colleges and universities “feel real constraints” on their spending? Does it mean that students are short-changed educationally? No. Harvard can ladle millions into a “diversity” crusade (that is, Larry Summers’ failed attempt to mollify his faculty enemies) and Princeton can build dorms that make students feel as though they’re staying in a posh hotel, but why should anyone care how they squander their funds?
Keep reading this post . . .
Slate and The Weekly Standard Agree . . .
That Obama ought to come out against racial preferences. Here’s Richard Kahlenberg’s Slate piece, and here’s Terry Eastland’s in The Weekly Standard.
Education Department Investigating ‘Black Male Initiative’
Chronicle of Higher Education blog post here. The New York Civil Rights Coalition filed two complaints against the City University of New York program in 2006, one arguing the program itself would discriminate, the other arguing the hiring of program staff did. The government is looking into the initiative on a total of 16 campuses.
Of course, black males are a worthy target of educational remedies — whites outpace blacks in general, and black females outnumber black males in college admissions by a 3:1 ratio. Clearly there’s something going on here, but that doesn’t mean (A) that this program is legal or (B) that anyone can fix the problem at the college level. Most likely, whatever causes the severe gap, it’s already taken hold by the time anyone even thinks about the “school-to-college pipeline” the Black Male Initiative hopes to work on. Improvements targeted at younger students (vouchers, anyone?) would be more likely to see results.
You can read about the program here. Funniest part:
A new initiative intended to increase, encourage, and support the inclusion and educational success of under-represented groups in higher education, in particular black males. All programs and activities of the Black Male Initiative are open to all academically eligible students, faculty and staff, without regard to race, gender, national origin, or other characteristic.
That’s right: The Black Male Initiative is completely inclusive.
Non-Black Athletes, Historically Black Colleges
A reader brings to my attention an article in today’s Washington Post about historically black colleges and universities recruiting white athletes to play on their sports teams. This reader flags in particular the suggestion (by a white player at one such school, ironically) that “there could be limits on the number of scholarship white players at HBCUs to ensure the schools’ and teams’ missions and histories are not affected,” and notes the likely outcry if the shoe were on the other foot and such limits were placed on the number of black athletes at non-HBCUs. Good point. Still, in all the article is refreshing, since clearly what the schools care most about is winning, not political correctness, and the players just want to play.
Pell Grants for All Trapped Students
Rabbi Avi Shafran considers the potential of the president’s new proposed initiative “Pell Grants for Kids.” Current Pell Grants are meant to help low-income students attend postsecondary school; Bush would like to apply the model to younger students, and indeed all students who cannot afford decent education. Expanding this model would be tantamount to creating vouchers that are “more than a ‘next stop’ after a child has been sentenced to wasted years — or worse — in a failing school.”
More on Endowment Spending
Inside Higher Ed has a story about Friday’s conference at AEI on college endowment spending.
I have a solution. It’s awfully politically incorrect, but it slices right through the Gordian Knot: Abolish the income tax. This problem wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for the fact that the income tax is used to reward certain behaviors and punish others. The income tax gives rise to a whole universe of bad consequences, of which endowment “hoarding” but a fairly minor one.
Justifying the Term ‘Islamofacism’
Andrew Bostom provides the doctrinal and historical background for understanding and using the word “Islamofascism” correctly, that is by “acknowledging the direct nexus between Islam, pre-modern despotism, and modern totaliarian ideologies.”
The ‘Sex Workers Art Show’ Does Duke
On Sunday night, Duke University hosted the “Sex Workers Art Show.” My colleague Jay Schalin attended and writes about it here.
If there is any point to this, other than wallowing in vulgarity, it escapes both of us.
Reactions to ‘Al-Arian’s Third Strike’
Stephen Emerson’s recent article “Al-Arian’s Third Strike” has provoked responses from two federal officers who disagree with George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley’s view that there is “a new and disturbing trend by the Bush Administration in using grand juries against individuals who they fail to convict in criminal cases.” According to Emerson:
One pointed out that civil contempt has been used during a number of presidential administrations of all stripes to compel testimony and recounted in detail how, after several tries, a reluctant witness in a drug case finally testified truthfully and triggered indictments of dozens more people. We are publishing the comments of the other official, who consented under a condition of anonymity.
Agresto on the Pitfalls of Hope
John Agresto is the author of Mugged by Reality: The Liberation of Iraq and the Failure of Good Intentions, and the Interim Provost of the New American University of Iraq in Sulaimani. Regarding the great difficulties in establishing democracy in countries such as Iraq, he solemnly warns “the hopeful ones,” i.e.:
The hopeful on the right who think if we can just get democracy straight in the Middle East all will yet be well, and the hopeful on the left who put their money on “negotiation,” greater communication, and mutual understanding.
Agresto admonishes those on the right who, in facilely promoting democracy in places where tribal, religious, political and personal differences dominate, endanger America, as we are now confronted by “the growth of Islamic fundamentalism as a mass, popular, democratic movement. Thus, the more we promote ‘democracy,’ the more we might well be promoting elected extreme Islamist governments worldwide.”
As for multicultural leftists, and in particular academics, he excoriates them for their simplistic accusations of “ugly ethnocentrism” whenever confronted by the often hateful reality of the “culture of honor and retribution” in the Middle East.
We need more such nuanced thinking about the dangers that face us, including the blinding politics of hope.
Re: Maryland District Sex Lessons Challenged
I’d agree that school sex-ed curriculi frequently promote agenda over fact. That said, on homosexuality being innate, I’d argue the school district is closer to the truth. One can say the evidence isn’t quite conclusive, and therefore schools shouldn’t teach it yet, but on balance the facts support that theory.
The best article I’ve found on the topic is this one from New York magazine. In just one interesting biological marker, the hair whorls on the back of gay men’s heads tend to run in the opposite direction to those on straights’. Of course, some gay men can force themselves to live as straights, but that doesn’t mean the tendency itself isn’t innate.
It’s important to recognize the difference between “biological” and “genetic” — most of the leading theories posit that something happens in the womb, after conception, specifically during the flush of male/female hormones.
From Daily Me to Daily Them
Cass Sunstein astutely comments in the Financial Times on how many people use the Internet to construct a “Daily Me” — “information cocoons” or “echo chambers” that bombard them with material that confirms the views they already hold. He cites a 2005 study of groups composed of either left-wing or right-wing members, which concluded:
- In almost every group, people ended up with more extreme positions.
- Aside from increasing extremism, discussion had another effect: it squelched diversity.
- When people find their views corroborated, they become more confident and so are more willing to be extreme.
- People who favour a position think of themselves in a certain way and if they are with people who agree with them, they shift a bit to hold on to their preferred self-conception.
- The internet is thus a powerful tool for intensifying group polarisation, with important ramifications for the electoral process. The “self-sorting” that it so greatly facilitates results in “more confidence, extremism and increased contempt for those with contrary views.”
It is plausible that the Internet contributes to an especially intense level of self-sorting among campus denizens, who have constant access to high-speed online service. But, then, such self-sorting is also greatly advanced by corrupt faculty hiring and student organizational practices — and hence the thriving of departmental and student-organizational “information cocoons,” radicalism, and intolerance of opposite opinions.