Google+
Close

Global Warming Hysteria the Same as Prohibition



Text  



Michael Goldfarb of The Weekly Standard posts some more of the interesting testimony from William Happer (Professor of Physics at Princeton University) that Ed excerpted on Wednesday:

I believe that the increase of CO2 is not a cause for alarm and will be good for mankind. I predict that future historians will look back on this period much as we now view the period just before the passage of the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution to prohibit “the manufacturing, sale or transportation of intoxicating liquors.” At the time, the 18th amendment seemed to be exactly the right thing to do — who wanted to be in league with demon rum? It was the 1917 version of saving the planet. More than half the states enacted prohibition laws before the 18th amendment was ratified. Only one state, Rhode Island, voted against the 18th amendment. Two states, Illinois and Indiana, never got around to voting and all the rest voted for it. There were many thoughtful people, including a majority of Rhode Islanders, who thought that prohibition might do more harm than good. But they were completely outmatched by the temperance movement, whose motives and methods had much in common with the movement to stop climate change. Deeply sincere people thought they were saving humanity from the evils of alcohol, just as many people now sincerely think they are saving humanity from the evils of CO2.

The only problem is, during Prohibition, I could have made alcohol in my bathtub. Under CO2-hibition, it will prove a bit more difficult to make low-cost electricity in my bathtub.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review