Republican Congressman Bob Inglis, who lost a primary challenge to Tea Party-backed Trey Gowdy in the SC-04, rips into the GOP for not supporting “green” energy in the United States. Video here:
INGLIS: I’m very excited to be here Mr. Chairman, because this is on the record. And it’s a wonderful thing about Congressional hearings — they’re on the record. Kim Beasley (SP?) who’s Australia’s ambassador to the United States tells me that when he runs into a climate skeptic, he says to them, “Make sure to say that very publicly, because I want our grandchildren to read what you said and what I said. And so, we’re on the record, and our grandchildren, or great-grandchildren, are going to read. And so some are here suggesting to those children that here’s a deal: Your child is sick — this is what Tom Friedman gave me this great analogy yesterday — Your child is sick. 98 doctors say treat him this way. Two say no, this other way is the way to go. I’ll go with the two. You’re taking a big risk with those kids. Because 98 of the doctors say, “Do this thing,” two say, “Do the other.” So, it’s on the record.
And we’re here with important decision to be made. And I would also suggest to my Free Enterprise colleagues — especially conservatives here — whether you think it’s all a bunch of hooey, what we’ve talked about in this committee, the Chinese don’t. And they plan on eating our lunch in this next century. They plan on innovating around these problems, and selling to us, and the rest of the world, the technology that’ll lead the 21st century. So we may just press the pause button here for several years, but China is pressing the fast-forward button. And as a result, if we wake up in several years and we say, “geez, this didn’t work very well for us. The two doctors didn’t turn out to be so right. 98 might have been the ones to listen to.” then what we’ll find is we’re way behind those Chinese folks. ‘Cuz you know, if you got a certain number of geniuses in the population — if you’re one in a million in China, there’s 1300 of you. And you know what?
They plan on leading the future. So whether you — if you’re a free enterprise conservative here — just think: it’s a bunch of hooey, this science is a bunch of hooey. But if you miss the commercial opportunity, you’ve really missed something. And so, I think it’s great to be here on the record. I think it’s great to see the opportunity we’ve got ahead of us. And, I also — since this is sort of a swan song for me and Mr. Barrett I’d encourage scientists who are listening out there to get ready for the hearings that are coming up in the next Congress. Those will be difficult hearings for climate scientists. But, I would encourage you to welcome those as fabulous opportunities to teach.
As a citizen of South Carolina I am glad this guy is exiting the stage. On those 98 Doctors, I'm still waiting for the name of the 4000 or is it 2500 climate scientists. And for the record, I believe bloodletting was once consensus science. The Green economic blood letting is not going to lead to a cure.
OK, I'll play along with the analogy. Let's say those 98 doctors carry a voodoo doll and pins in their pocket. Do you still want to take their advice? Your turn, sir.
We know some facts: CO2 is a trace gas necessary for life on earth; CO2 is a weak heat-retaining gas; CO2's heat retention capacity is a negative logarithm of its atmospheric concentration; the oceans carry and release CO2 in patterns not yet fully known but in amounts that dwarf mankind's production.
A 'flat earth' was consensus, too, until the skeptics questioned it and proved them wrong. Goodbye, congressman.
I just wonder what, as a Congressman, Rep. Inglis is talking about? With trillion dollar annual deficits queuing up as far as the eye can see, we need to borrow MORE money to subsidize MORE boondoogles like Tesla and Solyndra? This marketplace that these Statist-Greenists always conjure, what is it? Solar panels? Wind turbines? If there IS a profit-making market in these categories, the private sector will exploit it. If there is not, if we try to create one with federal subsidies and mandates, we'll only squander more of our children's wealth, for no good reason. If there is profit out there in the future, then let the PRC subsidize the R&D and develop the economies of scale. The costs of production lowered and the market coming to maturity, again the private sector will jump in. What about the free enterprise model is it that Rep. Inglis doesn't understand?
As a citizen of South Carolina I am glad this guy is exiting the stage. On those 98 Doctors, I'm still waiting for the name of the 4000 or is it 2500 climate scientists. And for the record, I believe bloodletting was once consensus science. The Green economic blood letting is not going to lead to a cure.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOK, I'll play along with the analogy. Let's say those 98 doctors carry a voodoo doll and pins in their pocket. Do you still want to take their advice? Your turn, sir.
We know some facts: CO2 is a trace gas necessary for life on earth; CO2 is a weak heat-retaining gas; CO2's heat retention capacity is a negative logarithm of its atmospheric concentration; the oceans carry and release CO2 in patterns not yet fully known but in amounts that dwarf mankind's production.
A 'flat earth' was consensus, too, until the skeptics questioned it and proved them wrong. Goodbye, congressman.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI just wonder what, as a Congressman, Rep. Inglis is talking about? With trillion dollar annual deficits queuing up as far as the eye can see, we need to borrow MORE money to subsidize MORE boondoogles like Tesla and Solyndra? This marketplace that these Statist-Greenists always conjure, what is it? Solar panels? Wind turbines? If there IS a profit-making market in these categories, the private sector will exploit it. If there is not, if we try to create one with federal subsidies and mandates, we'll only squander more of our children's wealth, for no good reason. If there is profit out there in the future, then let the PRC subsidize the R&D and develop the economies of scale. The costs of production lowered and the market coming to maturity, again the private sector will jump in. What about the free enterprise model is it that Rep. Inglis doesn't understand?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThank you South Carolina! Thank you, thank you, thank you. And Congressman? Don't let the door hit you...
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse